Literature DB >> 12169942

Comparing measures of injury severity for use with large databases.

Shaun C R Stephenson1, John D Langley, Ian D Civil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After recent debate about the best measure of anatomic injury severity, this study aimed to compare four measures based on Abbreviated Injury Scale scores derived using ICDMAP-90-the Modified Anatomic Profile (ICD/mAP), Anatomic Profile Score (ICD/APS), Injury Severity Score (ICD/ISS), and New Injury Severity Score (ICD/NISS)-with the International Classification of Diseases-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS).
METHODS: Data were selected from New Zealand public hospital discharges from 1989 to 1998. There were 349,409 patients in the dataset, of whom 3,871 had died. Models were compared in terms of their discrimination and calibration using logistic regression. Age was included as a covariate.
RESULTS: The ICISS and ICD/mAP were the best performing measures. Adding age significantly improved the discrimination and calibration of almost all the models.
CONCLUSION: The ICISS is a viable alternative to ICDMAP-based measures for coding anatomic injury severity on large datasets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169942     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200208000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  23 in total

1.  Overcoming barriers to population-based injury research: development and validation of an ICD10-to-AIS algorithm.

Authors:  Barbara Haas; Wei Xiong; Maureen Brennan-Barnes; David Gomez; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Diagnosis based injury severity scaling: investigation of a method using Australian and New Zealand hospitalisations.

Authors:  S Stephenson; G Henley; J E Harrison; J D Langley
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Severity of injury measures and descriptive epidemiology.

Authors:  C Cryer
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Developing valid indicators of injury incidence for "all injury".

Authors:  C Cryer; J D Langley
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Consensus or data-derived anatomical severity scoring?

Authors:  Lynne Moore; André Lavoie; Natalie Le Sage; Eric Bergeron
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2006

6.  Retrospective baseline measurement of self-reported health status and health-related quality of life versus population norms in the evaluation of post-injury losses.

Authors:  W L Watson; J Ozanne-Smith; J Richardson
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  The difference between ISS and NISS in a series of trauma patients in Brazil.

Authors:  Iveth Y Whitaker; Terezinha D Gennari; Aristarcho L Whitaker
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2003

8.  Benchmarking of trauma care worldwide: the potential value of an International Trauma Data Bank (ITDB).

Authors:  Adil H Haider; Zain G Hashmi; Sonia Gupta; Syed Nabeel Zafar; Jean-Stephane David; David T Efron; Kent A Stevens; Hasnain Zafar; Eric B Schneider; Eric Voiglio; Raul Coimbra; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Trauma indices for prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Majid Afshar; Gordon S Smith; Richard S Cooper; Sarah Murthi; Giora Netzer
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Epidemiology of Fatal Trauma in Italy in 2002 Using Population-Based Registries.

Authors:  Osvaldo Chiara; Alessio Pitidis; Lucia Lispi; Silvia Bruzzone; Carla Ceccolini; Paola Cacciatore; Stefania Cimbanassi; Franco Taggi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.