Literature DB >> 20482360

Longitudinal growth changes of the cranial base from puberty to adulthood. A comparison of different superimposition methods.

Zuleyha Mirzen Arat1, Hakan Türkkahraman, Jeryl D English, Ronald L Gallerano, Jim C Boley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the stability of cranial reference landmarks from puberty through adulthood and to compare the displacement of these landmarks among the superimposition methods of Björk, Ricketts, Steiner, and the proposed tuberculum sella-wing (T-W) reference line.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of serial lateral cephalometric radiographs of 30 Class II division 1 patients taken at the pretreatment (T1; mean age, 11.98 years), posttreatment (T2; mean age, 15.32 years) and postretention (T3; mean age, 32.12 years) periods. All cephalometric radiographs were superimposed at the cranial base according to the overall superimposition methods of Björk, Ricketts, Steiner, and the T-W method. The horizontal and vertical displacements of cranial landmarks (nasion, wing, tuberculum sella, sella, basion, and pterygomaxillare) were assessed by paired t-test according to Björk's structural method. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison of the displacement of cranial landmarks among the superimposition methods.
RESULTS: The tuberculum sella and wing were the most stable cranial landmarks of the cranial base. The stability of sella and pterygomaxillare points were somewhat questionable. Nasion and basion were highly variable. The displacements of all cranial landmarks were similar between the Björk and T-W methods in all study periods. Most of the cranial landmarks displaced similarly in the horizontal direction among the methods. Vertically, the behaviors of the cranial landmarks were frequently different.
CONCLUSIONS: T-W is the most similar superimposition method to Björk's structural method; thus, it is a reliable method for examining overall facial changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20482360      PMCID: PMC8966442          DOI: 10.2319/080709-447.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  22 in total

1.  A comparison of three superimposition methods.

Authors:  Q L You; U Hägg
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The cranial base triangle.

Authors:  A D Viazis
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1991-09

3.  The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.

Authors:  Z Mirzen Arat; Meliha Rübendüz; Ayça Arman Akgül
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The cranial base for superimposition of lateral cephalometric radiographs.

Authors:  I Steuer
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1972-05

5.  The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application.

Authors:  A Björk
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification.

Authors:  S Baumrind; R C Frantz
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1971-08

7.  A study of the anterior cranial base.

Authors:  F P van der Linden; D H Enlow
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth.

Authors:  M L Moss; L Salentijn
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-06

9.  Accuracy of different methods of radiographic superimposition on cranial base structures.

Authors:  W J Houston; R T Lee
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Craniofacial growth and skeletal maturation: a mixed longitudinal study.

Authors:  M Arat; A Köklü; E Ozdiler; M Rübendüz; B Erdoğan
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of an automated superimposition method for computer-aided cephalometrics.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Moon; Hye-Won Hwang; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patients.

Authors:  M M El-Dawlatly; A M Abou-El-Ezz; F A El-Sharaby; Y A Mostafa
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Evaluation of Risk Factors for Severe Apical Root Resorption in the Maxillary Incisors Following Fixed Orthodontic Treatment.

Authors:  Bashar Shahrure; Ahu Acar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

4.  Stability of fiducial cephalometric landmarks of growing Class II malocclusion patients: a three-dimensional retrospective study.

Authors:  Lucas Garcia Santana; Paula Loureiro Cheib; Henrique Gontijo de Pársia; Lorenzo Franchi; Alexandre Moro; Bernardo Q Souki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.684

5.  Skeletal and Dental Effects of Twin-Block Appliances in Patients Treated With or Without Expansion.

Authors:  Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus; Burak Kale
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-09

6.  Effects of Type and Amount of Orthodontic Tooth Movement on Digital Model Superimposition Accuracy.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Farhad Salmanpour
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-12

7.  Evaluation of an automated superimposition method based on multiple landmarks for growing patients.

Authors:  Min-Gyu Kim; Jun-Ho Moon; Hye-Won Hwang; Sung Joo Cho; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.

Authors:  Marcos Augusto Lenza; Adilson Alves de Carvalho; Eduardo Beaton Lenza; Mauricio Guilherme Lenza; Hianne Miranda de Torres; João Batista de Souza
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

9.  Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Michael Schauseil; Pawel Pazera; Berna Zorkun; Christos Katsaros; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Superimposition-Based Cephalometric Method to Quantitate Craniofacial Changes.

Authors:  Nameer Al-Taai; Eva Levring Jäghagen; Maurits Persson; Maria Ransjö; Anna Westerlund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.