Literature DB >> 22216756

iGLASS: an improvement to the GLASS method for estimating species trees from gene trees.

Ethan M Jewett1, Noah A Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Several methods have been designed to infer species trees from gene trees while taking into account gene tree/species tree discordance. Although some of these methods provide consistent species tree topology estimates under a standard model, most either do not estimate branch lengths or are computationally slow. An exception, the GLASS method of Mossel and Roch, is consistent for the species tree topology, estimates branch lengths, and is computationally fast. However, GLASS systematically overestimates divergence times, leading to biased estimates of species tree branch lengths. By assuming a multispecies coalescent model in which multiple lineages are sampled from each of two taxa at L independent loci, we derive the distribution of the waiting time until the first interspecific coalescence occurs between the two taxa, considering all loci and measuring from the divergence time. We then use the mean of this distribution to derive a correction to the GLASS estimator of pairwise divergence times. We show that our improved estimator, which we call iGLASS, consistently estimates the divergence time between a pair of taxa as the number of loci approaches infinity, and that it is an unbiased estimator of divergence times when one lineage is sampled per taxon. We also show that many commonly used clustering methods can be combined with the iGLASS estimator of pairwise divergence times to produce a consistent estimator of the species tree topology. Through simulations, we show that iGLASS can greatly reduce the bias and mean squared error in obtaining estimates of divergence times in a species tree.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22216756      PMCID: PMC3298679          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2011.0231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  21 in total

Review 1.  Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies.

Authors:  S V Edwards; P Beerli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci.

Authors:  Bruce Rannala; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Lili Yu; Dennis K Pearl; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 4.  Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Lili Yu; Laura Kubatko; Dennis K Pearl; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Maximum tree: a consistent estimator of the species tree.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Lili Yu; Dennis K Pearl
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 6.  Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent.

Authors:  James H Degnan; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence.

Authors:  Laura S Kubatko; Bryan C Carstens; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences.

Authors:  Cuong Than; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  13 in total

1.  Phylogenetic trees and Euclidean embeddings.

Authors:  Mark Layer; John A Rhodes
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Theory and applications of a deterministic approximation to the coalescent model.

Authors:  Ethan M Jewett; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  IDXL: Species Tree Inference Using Internode Distance and Excess Gene Leaf Count.

Authors:  Sourya Bhattacharyya; Jayanta Mukherjee
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Consistency and inconsistency of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees in the presence of ancestral population structure.

Authors:  Michael DeGiorgio; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Improvements to a class of distance matrix methods for inferring species trees from gene trees.

Authors:  Laura J Helmkamp; Ethan M Jewett; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  A coalescent model for genotype imputation.

Authors:  Ethan M Jewett; Matthew Zawistowski; Noah A Rosenberg; Sebastian Zöllner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  An empirical evaluation of two-stage species tree inference strategies using a multilocus dataset from North American pines.

Authors:  Michael DeGiorgio; John Syring; Andrew J Eckert; Aaron Liston; Richard Cronn; David B Neale; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Concatenation and Species Tree Methods Exhibit Statistically Indistinguishable Accuracy under a Range of Simulated Conditions.

Authors:  João Tonini; Andrew Moore; David Stern; Maryia Shcheglovitova; Guillermo Ortí
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2015-03-09

9.  An analytical upper bound on the number of loci required for all splits of a species tree to appear in a set of gene trees.

Authors:  Lawrence H Uricchio; Tandy Warnow; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees: a unifying principle.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.