Literature DB >> 12939098

Review of analytical methods for prospective cohort studies using time to event data: single studies and implications for meta-analysis.

Derrick A Bennett1.   

Abstract

Prospective cohort studies are extremely important in epidemiological research as they give direct information on the sequence of events, which can be used to demonstrate causality. They also have the advantage that many diseases can be studied simultaneously. However, they are usually very time consuming and expensive to run. In addition, practitioners of evidence-based medicine prefer to make decisions based on several studies rather than a single study, hence the need for meta-analysis. The use of meta-analyses in order to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials is extremely popular in medicine and is also being utilized increasingly in epidemiology. The statistical methodology for meta-analyses of epidemiological studies is a long way behind in terms of the advances made in the methodology for randomized controlled trials. Numerous methodological issues, particularly in respect to dealing with biases inherent in these types of studies, have made the results of meta-analyses of epidemiological studies that use summary data open to criticism. This review mainly concentrates on analytical methods for prospective cohort studies that have survival outcomes. In addition, the implications for meta-analysis assuming that the analyst has access to individual participant data are also discussed. The approaches are described with respect to underlying theory and assumptions. It is hoped that this review will promote the use of these approaches in meta-analyses conducted in epidemiology as well as providing some directions for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12939098     DOI: 10.1191/0962280203sm319ra

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  9 in total

1.  Statistical approaches to harmonize data on cognitive measures in systematic reviews are rarely reported.

Authors:  Lauren E Griffith; Edwin van den Heuvel; Isabel Fortier; Nazmul Sohel; Scott M Hofer; Hélène Payette; Christina Wolfson; Sylvie Belleville; Meghan Kenny; Dany Doiron; Parminder Raina
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Prediction of incident stroke events based on retinal vessel caliber: a systematic review and individual-participant meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin McGeechan; Gerald Liew; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Johannes R Vingerling; Paulus T V M de Jong; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Monique M B Breteler; Jonathan Shaw; Paul Zimmet; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Financial hardship and mortality among older adults using the 1996-2004 Health and Retirement Study.

Authors:  Reginald D Tucker-Seeley; Yi Li; S V Subramanian; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Risk prediction of coronary heart disease based on retinal vascular caliber (from the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities [ARIC] Study).

Authors:  Kevin McGeechan; Gerald Liew; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Ronald Klein; A Richey Sharrett; Barbara E K Klein; Jie J Wang; Lloyd E Chambless; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Field-wide meta-analyses of observational associations can map selective availability of risk factors and the impact of model specifications.

Authors:  Stylianos Serghiou; Chirag J Patel; Yan Yu Tan; Peter Koay; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Statistical methods for the time-to-event analysis of individual participant data from multiple epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Simon Thompson; Stephen Kaptoge; Ian White; Angela Wood; Philip Perry; John Danesh
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Meta-analysis: retinal vessel caliber and risk for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Kevin McGeechan; Gerald Liew; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Johannes R Vingerling; Paulus T V M Dejong; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Monique M B Breteler; Jonathan Shaw; Paul Zimmet; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Incorporating published univariable associations in diagnostic and prognostic modeling.

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Hendrik Koffijberg; Difei Lu; Yvonne Vergouwe; Ewout W Steyerberg; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyond.

Authors:  R D Riley; W Sauerbrei; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.