Literature DB >> 12938708

The greater fragility of females' versus males' closest same-sex friendships.

Joyce F Benenson1, Athena Christakos.   

Abstract

Sixty females and 60 males between 10 and 15 years of age were interviewed about difficulties in current and past close same-sex friendships. Based on prior studies, it was hypothesized that females' closest same-sex friendships would be more fragile than those of males. Analyses comparing only the closest same-sex friendship of the two sexes demonstrated that females' current friendships were of a shorter duration, that females were more distressed than males when imagining the potential termination of their friendships, that more females' than males' friends already had done something to hurt the friendship, and that females had more former friendships that had ended than males had. Possible reasons are discussed for the greater vulnerability of this type of relationship for females.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12938708     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  25 in total

Review 1.  A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys.

Authors:  Amanda J Rose; Karen D Rudolph
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Living with difference: exploring the social self of adolescents with chronic pain.

Authors:  Paula A Forgeron; Joan Evans; Patrick J McGrath; Bonnie Stevens; G Allen Finley
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  A Survival Analysis of Adolescent Friendships: The Downside of Dissimilarity.

Authors:  Amy C Hartl; Brett Laursen; Antonius H N Cillessen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-07-17

4.  Asymmetries in the Friendship Preferences and Social Styles of Men and Women.

Authors:  Jacob M Vigil
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-06

5.  Human males appear more prepared than females to resolve conflicts with same-sex peers.

Authors:  Joyce F Benenson; Melissa N Kuhn; Patrick J Ryan; Anthony J Ferranti; Rose Blondin; Michael Shea; Chalice Charpentier; Melissa Emery Thompson; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-06

6.  Our Buddies, Ourselves: The Role of Sexual Homophily in Adolescent Friendship Networks.

Authors:  Sarah L Trinh; Jaemin Lee; Carolyn T Halpern; James Moody
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2018-03-25

7.  Reciprocity and behavioral heterogeneity govern the stability of social networks.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; T Brandt Ryder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Getting to know me better: An fMRI study of intimate and superficial self-disclosure to friends during adolescence.

Authors:  Nandita Vijayakumar; John C Flournoy; Kathryn L Mills; Theresa W Cheng; Arian Mobasser; Jessica E Flannery; Nicholas B Allen; Jennifer H Pfeifer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2020-02-10

9.  With Whom and Where You Play: Preschoolers' Social Context Predicts Peer Victimization.

Authors:  Naomi C Z Andrews; Laura D Hanish; Richard A Fabes; Carol Lynn Martin
Journal:  Soc Dev       Date:  2014-05-01

10.  Not all screen time is created equal: associations with mental health vary by activity and gender.

Authors:  Jean M Twenge; Eric Farley
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 4.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.