Literature DB >> 24845881

Human males appear more prepared than females to resolve conflicts with same-sex peers.

Joyce F Benenson1, Melissa N Kuhn, Patrick J Ryan, Anthony J Ferranti, Rose Blondin, Michael Shea, Chalice Charpentier, Melissa Emery Thompson, Richard W Wrangham.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate sex differences in proximate mechanisms that precede the termination of conflicts. In Study 1, we asked women and men to report their intensity of anger in response to hypothetical, common transgressions involving a same-sex roommate. Direct verbal and physical aggression elicited the highest-intensity anger for both sexes, although overall women reported more intense anger than men to all transgressions. In Study 2, we examined sex differences in subjective and physiological reactions to a conflict using a role-playing scenario. Following recall of a conflict involving direct aggression and role-playing a reaction to it, compared with men, women reported their anger would dissipate less quickly and they would take longer to reconcile. Women also exhibited increased heart rate, but little change in cortisol, whereas men exhibited little change in heart rate but increased cortisol production. We interpret the results as indicating that women are less prepared than men to resolve a conflict with a same-sex peer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24845881     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-014-9198-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  37 in total

Review 1.  Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.

Authors:  S E Taylor; L C Klein; B P Lewis; T L Gruenewald; R A Gurung; J A Updegraff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Neural correlates of mental rehearsal in dorsal premotor cortex.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; John F Kalaska
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: a social-role analysis.

Authors:  John Archer
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2006

4.  Males' greater tolerance of same-sex peers.

Authors:  Joyce F Benenson; Henry Markovits; Caitlin Fitzgerald; Diana Geoffroy; Julianne Flemming; Sonya M Kahlenberg; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-01-02

Review 5.  Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: a meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion.

Authors:  Ginette C Blackhart; Brian C Nelson; Megan L Knowles; Roy F Baumeister
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-09-21

6.  Evidence that children and adolescents have internal models of peer interactions that are gender differentiated.

Authors:  H Markovits; J Benenson; E Dolenszky
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

7.  Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Authors:  C Kirschbaum; B M Kudielka; J Gaab; N C Schommer; D H Hellhammer
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

8.  Why women apologize more than men: gender differences in thresholds for perceiving offensive behavior.

Authors:  Karina Schumann; Michael Ross
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-09-20

9.  Sex differences in stress responses: social rejection versus achievement stress.

Authors:  Laura R Stroud; Peter Salovey; Elissa S Epel
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Reconciliation and consolation in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  Elisabetta Palagi; Tommaso Paoli; Silvana Borgognini Tarli
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.371

View more
  1 in total

1.  Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends.

Authors:  Joyce F Benenson; Maxwell M White; Delfina Martinez Pandiani; Lindsay J Hillyer; Sera Kantor; Henry Markovits; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.