Literature DB >> 12938136

Inflow effect in first-pass cardiac and renal MRI.

Marko K Ivancevic1, Ivan Zimine, David Foxall, Guillaume Lecoq, Alberto Righetti, Dominique Didier, Jean-Paul Vallée.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the effect of the inflow effect on the arterial input function in vivo in cardiac and renal MR perfusion imaging using fast gradient echo (GRE) sequences and contrast media.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MR exam protocol was designed to acquire images at different phases of the cardiac cycle. The arterial input was thus influenced by various blood flow velocities.
RESULTS: It was found that the inflow effect was negligible in the left ventricle of the heart, while it was significantly higher in the aorta for the kidney perfusion measurement. This was principally due to the higher through-the-plane component of the blood flow velocity in the aorta than in the left ventricle.
CONCLUSION: The inflow effect can be neglected in the heart cavity, but should be taken into account in renal perfusion. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12938136     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

Review 1.  Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer.

Authors:  Michael Ingrisch; Steven Sourbron
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Influence of the cardiac cycle on time-intensity curves using multislice dynamic magnetic resonance perfusion.

Authors:  Alain Nchimi; Isabelle Mancini; Thomas K Y Broussaud
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Jignesh Patel; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Comparison of quantitative parameters in cervix cancer measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT.

Authors:  Cheng Yang; Walter M Stadler; Gregory S Karczmar; Michael Milosevic; Ivan Yeung; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI analysis.

Authors:  Cheng Yang; Gregory S Karczmar; Milica Medved; Aytekin Oto; Marta Zamora; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.668

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.