Literature DB >> 12938130

Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 Tesla.

Donald W Chakeres1, Robert Bornstein, Allahyar Kangarlu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To discover whether there was a measurable alteration in cognitive performance in humans when exposed to a static magnetic field of 8 Tesla (T).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five normal human subjects were evaluated at both 0.05 and 8 T in a randomized order. Six standardized neuropsychological tests were administered and auditory reaction times were assessed. The cognitive assessment included measures of learning and retention, verbal fluency (spontaneous word generation), auditory attention, and auditory working memory. Alternate test forms were utilized to reduce practice effects. The sequential order of testing, 0.05 T first vs. 8 T first exposure, was randomized. The data was analyzed using univariate comparisons for correlated means to assess potential differences under the two conditions.
RESULTS: There were no clinically significant differences in any of the measures. On a measure of recognition memory the subjects performed significantly better in the 0.05T condition, but the difference was extremely small, not clinically meaningful, and likely due to statistical artifact.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that exposure of the brain to high magnetic fields of up to 8 T does not appear to alter human cognitive performance. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12938130     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  14 in total

1.  Subjective acceptance of 7 Tesla MRI for human imaging.

Authors:  Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Oliver Kraff; Christoph Moenninghoff; Mark E Ladd; Susanne C Ladd
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Health effects and safety of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Jonna Wilén; Kjell Hansson Mild; Lotte E van Nierop; Pauline Slottje; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  [Problems and chances of high field magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  M E Ladd; M Bock
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  10.5 T MRI static field effects on human cognitive, vestibular, and physiological function.

Authors:  Andrea Grant; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Cheryl Olman; Lin Zhang; Joseph Koopermeiners; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Margaret Koeritzer; Meredith E Adams; Thomas R Henry; Kamil Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 5.  Vestibular stimulation by magnetic fields.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey; David S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Nuclear magnetic resonance therapy in lumbar disc herniation with lumbar radicular syndrome: effects of the intervention on pain intensity, health-related quality of life, disease-related disability, consumption of pain medication, duration of sick leave and MRI analysis.

Authors:  H Salfinger; G Salomonowitz; K M Friedrich; J Hahne; J Holzapfel; M Friedrich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Vital signs investigation in subjects undergoing MR imaging at 8T.

Authors:  M Yang; G Christoforidis; A Abduljali; D Beversdorf
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 9.  [Ultrahigh field MRI in context of neurological diseases].

Authors:  J Kuchling; T Sinnecker; I Bozin; J Dörr; V I Madai; J Sobesky; T Niendorf; F Paul; J Wuerfel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.214

10.  Orientation within a high magnetic field determines swimming direction and laterality of c-Fos induction in mice.

Authors:  Thomas A Houpt; Bumsup Kwon; Charles E Houpt; Bryan Neth; James C Smith
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.