Donald W Chakeres1, Robert Bornstein, Allahyar Kangarlu. 1. Department of Radiology, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. Chakeres-l@medctr.osu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To discover whether there was a measurable alteration in cognitive performance in humans when exposed to a static magnetic field of 8 Tesla (T). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-five normal human subjects were evaluated at both 0.05 and 8 T in a randomized order. Six standardized neuropsychological tests were administered and auditory reaction times were assessed. The cognitive assessment included measures of learning and retention, verbal fluency (spontaneous word generation), auditory attention, and auditory working memory. Alternate test forms were utilized to reduce practice effects. The sequential order of testing, 0.05 T first vs. 8 T first exposure, was randomized. The data was analyzed using univariate comparisons for correlated means to assess potential differences under the two conditions. RESULTS: There were no clinically significant differences in any of the measures. On a measure of recognition memory the subjects performed significantly better in the 0.05T condition, but the difference was extremely small, not clinically meaningful, and likely due to statistical artifact. CONCLUSION: This study shows that exposure of the brain to high magnetic fields of up to 8 T does not appear to alter human cognitive performance. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To discover whether there was a measurable alteration in cognitive performance in humans when exposed to a static magnetic field of 8 Tesla (T). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five normal human subjects were evaluated at both 0.05 and 8 T in a randomized order. Six standardized neuropsychological tests were administered and auditory reaction times were assessed. The cognitive assessment included measures of learning and retention, verbal fluency (spontaneous word generation), auditory attention, and auditory working memory. Alternate test forms were utilized to reduce practice effects. The sequential order of testing, 0.05 T first vs. 8 T first exposure, was randomized. The data was analyzed using univariate comparisons for correlated means to assess potential differences under the two conditions. RESULTS: There were no clinically significant differences in any of the measures. On a measure of recognition memory the subjects performed significantly better in the 0.05T condition, but the difference was extremely small, not clinically meaningful, and likely due to statistical artifact. CONCLUSION: This study shows that exposure of the brain to high magnetic fields of up to 8 T does not appear to alter human cognitive performance. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Oliver Kraff; Christoph Moenninghoff; Mark E Ladd; Susanne C Ladd Journal: MAGMA Date: 2007-12-07 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Frank de Vocht; Jonna Wilén; Kjell Hansson Mild; Lotte E van Nierop; Pauline Slottje; Hans Kromhout Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Andrea Grant; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Cheryl Olman; Lin Zhang; Joseph Koopermeiners; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Margaret Koeritzer; Meredith E Adams; Thomas R Henry; Kamil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey; David S Zee Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.266
Authors: J Kuchling; T Sinnecker; I Bozin; J Dörr; V I Madai; J Sobesky; T Niendorf; F Paul; J Wuerfel Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Thomas A Houpt; Bumsup Kwon; Charles E Houpt; Bryan Neth; James C Smith Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 3.619