Literature DB >> 12933565

Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards.

R Xu1, J O'Quigley.   

Abstract

We present an estimator of average regression effect under a non-proportional hazards model, where the regression effect of the covariates on the log hazard ratio changes with time. In the absence of censoring, the new estimate coincides with the usual partial likelihood estimate, both estimates being consistent for a parameter having an interpretation as an average population regression effect. In the presence of an independent censorship, the new estimate is still consistent for this same population parameter, whereas the partial likelihood estimate will converge to a different quantity that depends on censoring. We give an approximation of the population average effect as integral beta(t)dF(t). The new estimate is easy to compute, requiring only minor modifications to existing softwares. We illustrate the use of the average effect estimate on a breast cancer dataset from Institut Curie. The behavior of the estimator, its comparison with the partial likelihood estimate, as well as the approximation by integral beta(t)dF(t)are studied via simulation.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 12933565     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  34 in total

1.  Risk of heart failure among postmenopausal women: a secondary analysis of the randomized trial of vitamin D plus calcium of the women's health initiative.

Authors:  Macarius M Donneyong; Carlton A Hornung; Kira C Taylor; Richard N Baumgartner; John A Myers; Charles B Eaton; Eiran Z Gorodeski; Liviu Klein; Lisa W Martin; James M Shikany; Yiqing Song; Wenjun Li; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Estimation of treatment effects based on possibly misspecified Cox regression.

Authors:  Satoshi Hattori; Masayuki Henmi
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  On proportional hazards assumption under the random effects models.

Authors:  Ronghui Xu; Anthony Gamst
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Antihypertensive medications and serious fall injuries in a nationally representative sample of older adults.

Authors:  Mary E Tinetti; Ling Han; David S H Lee; Gail J McAvay; Peter Peduzzi; Cary P Gross; Bingqing Zhou; Haiqun Lin
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Quantifying time-varying cause-specific hazard and subdistribution hazard ratios with competing risks data.

Authors:  Guoqing Diao; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Robust inference in discrete hazard models for randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vinh Q Nguyen; Daniel L Gillen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Assessing potentially time-dependent treatment effect from clinical trials and observational studies for survival data, with applications to the Women's Health Initiative combined hormone therapy trial.

Authors:  Song Yang; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  EFFECTIVELY SELECTING A TARGET POPULATION FOR A FUTURE COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Authors:  Lihui Zhao; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Brian Claggett; L J Wei
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  A Semiparametric Change-Point Regression Model for Longitudinal Observations.

Authors:  Haipeng Xing; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Landmark risk prediction of residual life for breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.