Literature DB >> 12932164

Can intrasac pressure monitoring reliably predict failure of endovascular aneurysm repair?

Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni1, Geoffrey L Gilling-Smith, John A Brennan, Richard R Heyes, John A Hunt, Thien V How, Peter L Harris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if pressure measured at a single location within aneurysm sac thrombus accurately reflects the force applied to the aneurysm wall and the risk of rupture by examining (1) if pressure is distributed uniformly within aneurysm thrombus, (2) the pressure transmission through aneurysm thrombus, and (3) the microstructural basis for pressure transmission.
METHODS: Pressure within aneurysm thrombus was measured by direct puncture through the aneurysm wall at 121 sites in 26 patients during open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Measurements were taken prior to cross clamping and compared with intrasac pressure measured at 30 sites in 6 patients without aneurysm thrombus (controls). Transmission of pressure through aneurysm thrombus was further examined ex vivo by subjecting fresh thrombus to a pressure gradient in a custom-made pressure cell. Pressure transmission was correlated with matrix density as determined by light microscopy and image analysis.
RESULTS: Mean pressure within aneurysm thrombus was higher than mean systemic pressure in 11 patients, lower in 1, and identical in 9. In 5 patients, the pressure was greater than systemic in some areas of the thrombus but less in others. Sac pressure was identical to systemic pressure at all sites in the controls. In 12 thrombus specimens (6 patients) examined in the pressure cell, pressure transmission varied significantly between specimens, correlating directly with matrix density (R(2)=0.747, p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pressure transmission through aneurysm thrombus is variable and depends upon the microstructure of the thrombus. Pressure measured at a single location may not, therefore, accurately reflect the pressure acting on the aneurysm wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12932164     DOI: 10.1177/152660280301000318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  5 in total

1.  Significance of initial aortic aneurysm pressure sensor readings varies with aortic endograft design.

Authors:  Gautam Shrikhande; Sikandar Khan; Hafiz Hussain; Alicia Menezes; James McKinsey; Harry Bush
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Aortic aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair using an implantable remote sensor: initial experience and short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Hanno Hoppe; Jocelyn A Segall; Timothy K Liem; Gregory J Landry; John A Kaufman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation and Coil Embolization of the Aortic Side Branches for Prevention of Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Atsushi Aoki; Kazuto Maruta; Norifumi Hosaka; Tadashi Omoto; Tomoaki Masuda; Takehiko Gokan
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2017-12-25

4.  Detecting endoleaks after endovascular AAA repair with a minimally invasive, implantable, telemetric pressure sensor: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Fabian Springer; Roland Schlierf; Joachim-Georg Pfeffer; Andreas H Mahnken; Uwe Schnakenberg; Thomas Schmitz-Rode
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Correlation between intrasac pressure measurements of a pressure sensor and an angiographic catheter during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Pierre Galvagni Silveira; Christopher William Teixeira Miller; Rafael Freygang Mendes; Gilberto Nascimento Galego
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.