Objectives: Aneurysm shrinkage after EVAR is the strong factor of favorable outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and type II endoleaks is the risk factor of no aneurysm shrinkage or aneurysm enlargement in the long term. In this study, we evaluate the aortic side branches relate to early postoperative type II endoleak, and performed coil embolization for those vessels for prevention of type II endoleak. Methods: Patency and diameter of aortic side branches including inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar artery (LA) were evaluated in 56 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who were scheduled for EVAR. Coil embolization with Interlock was performed in 24 patients during EVAR for all patent IMA and LA with maximal diameter more than 2.0 mm. Computed tomography was performed one week after EVAR for evaluation of endoleak. Results: In patients with IMA more than 2.5 mm in diameter, the frequency of type II endoleak was approximately 90% regardless of the number of patent LA. In case with patent IMA less than 2.5 mm or with 2 or more patent LA larger than 2.0 mm, the frequency of type II endoleak was 46 to 67%. Coil embolization for IMA was successfully performed in 15/16 patients (94%). Coil embolization of LA was performed for patent LA larger than 2.0 mm and 29 out of 45 LA (64%) were successfully occluded. There was no perioperative complication associated with coil embolization. The frequency of type II endoleak was significantly lower in patients with coil embolization than those without coil embolization (4.2% vs 58.9%, p<0.0001). Conclusion: Patent IMA and LA in diameter larger than 2.0 mm were associated with type II endoleak one week after EVAR, and coil embolization with Interlock during EVAR is safe and effective procedure to prevent type II endoleak. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2016; 25: 321-328.).
Objectives:Aneurysm shrinkage after EVAR is the strong factor of favorable outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and type II endoleaks is the risk factor of no aneurysm shrinkage or aneurysm enlargement in the long term. In this study, we evaluate the aortic side branches relate to early postoperative type II endoleak, and performed coil embolization for those vessels for prevention of type II endoleak. Methods: Patency and diameter of aortic side branches including inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar artery (LA) were evaluated in 56 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who were scheduled for EVAR. Coil embolization with Interlock was performed in 24 patients during EVAR for all patent IMA and LA with maximal diameter more than 2.0 mm. Computed tomography was performed one week after EVAR for evaluation of endoleak. Results: In patients with IMA more than 2.5 mm in diameter, the frequency of type II endoleak was approximately 90% regardless of the number of patent LA. In case with patent IMA less than 2.5 mm or with 2 or more patent LA larger than 2.0 mm, the frequency of type II endoleak was 46 to 67%. Coil embolization for IMA was successfully performed in 15/16 patients (94%). Coil embolization of LA was performed for patent LA larger than 2.0 mm and 29 out of 45 LA (64%) were successfully occluded. There was no perioperative complication associated with coil embolization. The frequency of type II endoleak was significantly lower in patients with coil embolization than those without coil embolization (4.2% vs 58.9%, p<0.0001). Conclusion: Patent IMA and LA in diameter larger than 2.0 mm were associated with type II endoleak one week after EVAR, and coil embolization with Interlock during EVAR is safe and effective procedure to prevent type II endoleak. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2016; 25: 321-328.).
Entities:
Keywords:
abdominal aortic aneurysm; coil embolization; endovascular surgery; type II endoleak
Authors: K Mani; T Lees; B Beiles; L P Jensen; M Venermo; G Simo; D Palombo; E Halbakken; T Troëng; P Wigger; M Björck Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: L Engellau; E M Larsson; U Albrechtsson; T Jonung; E Ribbe; J Thörne; Z Zdanowski; L Norgren Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Thomas J Ward; Stuart Cohen; Rahul S Patel; Edward Kim; Aaron M Fischman; Francis S Nowakowski; Sharif H Ellozy; Peter L Faries; Michael L Marin; Robert A Lookstein Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Frederico Bastos Gonçalves; Koen M van de Luijtgaarden; Sanne E Hoeks; Johanna M Hendriks; Sander ten Raa; Ellen V Rouwet; Robert J Stolker; Hence J M Verhagen Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Shadpour Demehri; Jason Signorelli; Kanako K Kumamaru; Nicole Wake; Elizabeth George; Michael Hanley; Michael L Steigner; Michael L Steinger; Edwin Charles Gravereaux; Frank J Rybicki Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Zefu Zhang; Hassan Albadawi; Richard J Fowl; Izzet Altun; Marcela A Salomao; Jama Jahanyar; Brian W Chong; Joseph L Mayer; Rahmi Oklu Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 30.849