S H Heywang-Köbrunner1, I Schreer, T Decker, W Böcker. 1. Diagnostic Radiology, Martin-Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Street 16, 06097 Halle, Germany. sylvia.heywang@medizin.uni-halle.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quality assurance of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VB). METHOD: A consensus was achieved based on the existing literature and the experience of VB users (Ethicon Endosurgery, Norderstedt). RESULTS: The imaging work-up must be completed according to existing standards before an indication for stereotactic VB is established. Indications include microcalcifications and small non-palpable masses; for the time being lesions very close to the skin and architectural distortions (radial scar) are considered less suitable. Acquisition of >20 cores (11 Gauge) should be routinely attempted (goals: as complete a removal of small lesions as possible, thereby increasing diagnostic confidence and reducing so-called 'underestimates'). The pre/post-fire and post-biopsy stereotactic images and a post-biopsy orthogonal mammogram must be documented. All cases with no or uncertain histopathological correlation require discussion in a regular interdisciplinary conference and a documented consensus concerning further work-up or therapy. Standardised documentation of the primary findings and follow-up mammography after approximately 6 months is requested. CONCLUSION: This consensus includes protocols for the establishment of an indication, performance indicators, interdisciplinary interpretation and therapeutic recommendation, documentation and follow-up. It does not replace official recommendations for percutaneous biopsy.
PURPOSE: Quality assurance of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VB). METHOD: A consensus was achieved based on the existing literature and the experience of VB users (Ethicon Endosurgery, Norderstedt). RESULTS: The imaging work-up must be completed according to existing standards before an indication for stereotactic VB is established. Indications include microcalcifications and small non-palpable masses; for the time being lesions very close to the skin and architectural distortions (radial scar) are considered less suitable. Acquisition of >20 cores (11 Gauge) should be routinely attempted (goals: as complete a removal of small lesions as possible, thereby increasing diagnostic confidence and reducing so-called 'underestimates'). The pre/post-fire and post-biopsy stereotactic images and a post-biopsy orthogonal mammogram must be documented. All cases with no or uncertain histopathological correlation require discussion in a regular interdisciplinary conference and a documented consensus concerning further work-up or therapy. Standardised documentation of the primary findings and follow-up mammography after approximately 6 months is requested. CONCLUSION: This consensus includes protocols for the establishment of an indication, performance indicators, interdisciplinary interpretation and therapeutic recommendation, documentation and follow-up. It does not replace official recommendations for percutaneous biopsy.
Authors: Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Jörg Nährig; Astrid Hacker; Stefan Sedlacek; Heinz Höfler Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Jason M Johnson; Alisa K Johnson; Ellen S O'Meara; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Elise N Hotaling; Sally D Herschorn Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: P Taourel; D Hoa; C Chaveron; C Balu-Maestro; D Gros; M C Baranzelli; F Ettore; M F Bretz-Grenier; P Roger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 7.034