Literature DB >> 12921350

Distal landmarks and hippocampal place cells: effects of relative translation versus rotation.

James J Knierim1, Geeta Rao.   

Abstract

Hippocampal neurons are selectively active when a rat occupies restricted locations in an environment. These place cells derive their specificity from a multitude of sources, including idiothetic cues and sensory input derived from both distal and local landmarks. Most experiments have attempted to dissociate the relative strengths and roles played by these sources by rotating one set against the other. Few studies have addressed the effects of relative translation of the local cue set versus salient distal landmarks. To address this question, ensembles of place cells were recorded as a rectangular or circular track was moved to different locations in a room with controlled visual landmarks. Place cells primarily maintained their firing fields relative to the track (i.e., occupying new locations relative to the distal landmarks), even though the track could occupy completely nonoverlapping regions of the room. When the distal landmarks were rotated around the circular track, however, the place fields rotated with the landmarks, demonstrating that the cues were perceptible to the rat. These results suggest that, under these conditions, the spatial tuning of place cells may derive from an interaction between local and idiothetic cues, which define the precise firing locations of the cells and the relationships between them, and distal landmarks, which set the orientation of the ensemble representation relative to the external environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12921350     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  20 in total

1.  Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Framing of grid cells within and beyond navigation boundaries.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; J D Luck; James J Knierim
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Sublayer-Specific Coding Dynamics during Spatial Navigation and Learning in Hippocampal Area CA1.

Authors:  Nathan B Danielson; Jeffrey D Zaremba; Patrick Kaifosh; John Bowler; Max Ladow; Attila Losonczy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Dominance of the proximal coordinate frame in determining the locations of hippocampal place cell activity during navigation.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Joshua P Neunuebel; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Coming up: in search of the vertical dimension in the brain.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; James J Knierim
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Aged rats with preserved memory dynamically recruit hippocampal inhibition in a local/global cue mismatch environment.

Authors:  Audrey Branch; Amy Monasterio; Grace Blair; James J Knierim; Michela Gallagher; Rebecca P Haberman
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Memory-guided learning: CA1 and CA3 neuronal ensembles differentially encode the commonalities and differences between situations.

Authors:  Amir S Bahar; Prasad R Shirvalkar; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Conflicts between local and global spatial frameworks dissociate neural representations of the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Joshua P Neunuebel; D Yoganarasimha; Geeta Rao; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Influence of local objects on hippocampal representations: Landmark vectors and memory.

Authors:  Sachin S Deshmukh; James J Knierim
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.