Literature DB >> 12920601

Intra-operative tachycardia and peri-operative outcome.

Bernd Hartmann1, Axel Junger, Rainer Röhrig, Joachim Klasen, Andreas Jost, Matthias Benson, Helge Braun, Carsten Fuchs, Gunter Hempelmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intra-operative tachycardia is a common adverse event, often recorded as an indicator for process quality in quality assurance projects in anaesthesia.
METHODS: This retrospective study is based on data sets of 28,065 patients recorded with a computerised anaesthesia record-keeping system from 23 February 1999 to 31 December 2000 at a tertiary care university hospital. Cases were defined as patients with intra-operative tachycardia; references were automatically selected according to matching variables (high-risk surgery, severe congestive heart failure, severe coronary artery disease, significant carotid artery stenosis and/or history of stroke, renal failure, diabetes mellitus and urgency of surgery) in a stepwise fashion. Main outcome measures were hospital mortality, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and prolonged hospital stay. Differences in outcome measures between the matched pairs were assessed by univariate analysis. Stepwise regression models were developed to predict the impact of intra-operative tachycardia on the different outcome measures.
RESULTS: In our study 474 patients (1.7%) were found to have had intra-operative tachycardia. Matching was successful for 99.4% of the cases, leading to 471 cases and references. The crude mortality rates for the cases and matched references were 5.5% and 2.5%, respectively (P=0.020). Of all case patients, 22.3% were treated in an ICU, compared to 11.0% of the matched references (P=0.001). Hospital stay was prolonged in 25.1% of the patients with tachycardia compared to 15.1% of the matched references (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with intra-operative tachycardia who were undergoing non-cardiac surgery had a greater peri-operative risk, leading to increased mortality, greater frequency of admission to an ICU and prolonged hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12920601     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-003-0398-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  19 in total

1.  Clinical and practical requirements of online software for anesthesia documentation an experience report.

Authors:  M Benson; A Junger; L Quinzio; C Fuchs; G Sciuk; A Michel; K Marquardt; G Hempelmann
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Arterial blood pressure and heart rate discrepancies between handwritten and computerized anesthesia records.

Authors:  D L Reich; R K Wood; R Mattar; M Krol; D C Adams; S Hossain; C A Bodian
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Detection of intraoperative incidents by electronic scanning of computerized anesthesia records. Comparison with voluntary reporting.

Authors:  K V Sanborn; J Castro; M Kuroda; D M Thys
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Automated charting of physiological variables in anesthesia: a quantitative comparison of automated versus handwritten anesthesia records.

Authors:  J G Lerou; R Dirksen; M van Daele; G M Nijhuis; J F Crul
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1988-01

5.  Differences between handwritten and automatic blood pressure records.

Authors:  R I Cook; J S McDonald; E Nunziata
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Intraoperative hemodynamic predictors of mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  D L Reich; C A Bodian; M Krol; M Kuroda; T Osinski; D M Thys
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Acceptable ranges for vital signs during general anesthesia.

Authors:  J H van Oostrom; C Gravenstein; J S Gravenstein
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-11

8.  Effects of information feedback and pulse oximetry on the incidence of anesthesia complications.

Authors:  J B Cooper; D J Cullen; R Nemeskal; D C Hoaglin; C C Gevirtz; M Csete; C Venable
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  A survey of 112,000 anaesthetics at one teaching hospital (1975-83).

Authors:  M M Cohen; P G Duncan; W D Pope; C Wolkenstein
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-01

10.  Cardiovascular events in the postanesthesia care unit: contribution of risk factors.

Authors:  D K Rose; M M Cohen; D P DeBoer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  10 in total

1.  The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Liliana Bordeianou; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Does the Surgical Apgar Score measure intraoperative performance?

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; R Todd Lancaster; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Triage of high-risk surgical patients for intensive care.

Authors:  Julia B Sobol; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Surgical apgar score predicts early complication in transfemoral amputees: Retrospective study of 170 major amputations.

Authors:  Christian Wied; Nicolai B Foss; Morten T Kristensen; Gitte Holm; Thomas Kallemose; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-12-18

5.  Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Phenylephrine Eye Drops Combined With Intravenous Atropine.

Authors:  Qingyu Li; Jianxin Pang; Yang Deng; Shaochong Zhang; Yong Wang; Yang Gao; Xiaoyong Yuan; Yantao Wei; Hongbin Zhang; Junlian Tan; Wei Chi; Wenjun Guo
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Preoperative dexmedetomidine and intraoperative bradycardia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro De Cassai; Nicolò Sella; Federico Geraldini; Francesco Zarantonello; Tommaso Pettenuzzo; Laura Pasin; Margherita Iuzzolino; Nicolò Rossini; Elisa Pesenti; Giovanni Zecchino; Marina Munari; Paolo Navalesi; Annalisa Boscolo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-01-12

7.  Preoperative heart rate and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: results of a predefined secondary analysis of the VISION study.

Authors:  T E F Abbott; G L Ackland; R A Archbold; A Wragg; E Kam; T Ahmad; A W Khan; E Niebrzegowska; R N Rodseth; P J Devereaux; R M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  A Prospective International Multicentre Cohort Study of Intraoperative Heart Rate and Systolic Blood Pressure and Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery: Results of the VISION Study.

Authors:  Tom E F Abbott; Rupert M Pearse; R Andrew Archbold; Tahania Ahmad; Edyta Niebrzegowska; Andrew Wragg; Reitze N Rodseth; Philip J Devereaux; Gareth L Ackland
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Elevated preoperative heart rate associated with increased risk of cardiopulmonary complications after resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Danxia Fu; Chaoshuang Wu; Xiaoyu Li; Junping Chen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Risk factors and socio-economic burden in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma operation: a machine learning based analysis.

Authors:  Yijue Zhang; Sibo Zhu; Zhiqing Yuan; Qiwei Li; Ruifeng Ding; Xunxia Bao; Timing Zhen; Zhiliang Fu; Hailong Fu; Kaichen Xing; Hongbin Yuan; Tao Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.