Literature DB >> 2774266

Differences between handwritten and automatic blood pressure records.

R I Cook1, J S McDonald, E Nunziata.   

Abstract

Comparison of 46 handwritten and electromechanically generated blood pressure records revealed substantial differences between the recordings. The highest automated record pressures exceeded the highest pressures found in corresponding handwritten records. Similarly, the lowest pressures from automated records were lower than those from handwritten records. Seventeen records (37%) had at least three automatic blood pressure determinations with values substantially in excess of the most extreme values recorded by hand. No handwritten record contained a diastolic pressure above 110 mmHg. Discrepancies between handwritten and automatic records may arise from one or more causes. Among these are readings captured automatically but not observed by the anesthesiologist, faulty reconstruction of handwritten records from memory, and bias in favor of less controversial values.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2774266     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198909000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  22 in total

1.  Blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  R I Cook; D D Woods
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-01

2.  Anesthesia recordkeeping: accuracy of recall with computerized and manual entry recordkeeping.

Authors:  Thomas Corey Davis; Jeffrey A Green; Alexander Colquhoun; Brenda L Hage; Chuck Biddle
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Assessing data quality in manual entry of ventilator settings.

Authors:  David K Vawdrey; Reed M Gardner; R Scott Evans; James F Orme; Terry P Clemmer; Loren Greenway; Frank A Drews
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Documentation and Treatment of Intraoperative Hypotension: Electronic Anesthesia Records versus Paper Anesthesia Records.

Authors:  Torin D Shear; Mark Deshur; Brittany Lapin; Steven B Greenberg; Glenn S Murphy; Joseph Szokol; Michael Ujiki; Rebecca Newmark; Jessica Benson; Cody Koress; Connor Dwyer; Jeffery Vender
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Normal fluctuation of physiologic cardiovascular variables during anesthesia and the phenomenon of "smoothing".

Authors:  F E Block
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-04

6.  Improved detection of hypotension by automated noninvasive blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  R Kross; N Shah; S Shah; U Patel; R Rodman; R F Bedford
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-04

7.  Controlling data flow enhances anesthesiology's role in perioperative care.

Authors:  David L Reich
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Computerization of anesthesia information management--users' perspective.

Authors:  D W Edsall
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-10

9.  Computerization of anesthesia information management.

Authors:  J H Eichhorm; D W Edsall
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-01

10.  Use of an anesthesia information management system (AIMS) to evaluate the physiologic effects of hypnotic agents used to induce anesthesia.

Authors:  M Benson; A Junger; C Fuchs; L Quinzio; S Böttger; G Hempelmann
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.