Literature DB >> 12917953

Surgical interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults.

H H G Handoll1, R Madhok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fracture of the distal radius is a common clinical problem, particularly in older white women with osteoporosis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine when, and if so what type of, surgical intervention is the most appropriate treatment for fractures of the distal radius in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register (November 2002), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2003), EMBASE (1988 to 2003 Week 8), CINAHL (1982 to February 2003), the National Research Register (Issue 1, 2003), PEDro, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials involving skeletally mature patients with a fracture of the distal radius, which compared surgical treatment with conservative treatment, different types of surgical intervention or the duration of immobilisation after surgery. The main categories of surgical intervention were external fixation, percutaneous pinning, open reduction and internal fixation, and the insertion of bone scaffolding materials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All trials, meeting the selection criteria, were independently assessed by both reviewers for methodological quality. Data were extracted for anatomical, functional and clinical outcomes (including complications). The trials were grouped into categories relating to the main comparisons and types of surgical intervention. Despite clear heterogeneity in the characteristics of comparable trials, pooling of data was undertaken where possible and appropriate. MAIN
RESULTS: Forty eight trials, examining 25 treatment comparisons, met the inclusion criteria of this review. These involved a total of 4371 mainly female and older patients with generally displaced, often comminuted and potentially or evidently unstable fractures. Nearly half of the trials compared surgery with plaster cast immobilisation. Summarising the outcomes was hampered by the variation between the studies in participant characteristics, interventions, quality of trial methodology and reporting, and outcome measurement. Surgical methods were usually associated with better anatomical appearance after fracture healing, but there was inadequate evidence to confirm that these had resulted in better functional and clinical outcomes for the patients. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: The 48 randomised trials do not provide robust evidence for most of the decisions necessary in the management of these fractures. Although, in particular, there is some evidence to support the use of external fixation or percutaneous pinning, their precise role and methods are not established. It is also unclear whether surgical intervention of most fracture types will produce consistently better long-term outcomes. There is a need for good quality evidence for the surgical management of these fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12917953     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  44 in total

1.  [Fractures of the distal radius].

Authors:  J M Rueger; M J Hartel; A H Ruecker; M Hoffmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Systematic review of outcomes following fixed angle intramedullary fixation of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  John Hardman; Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Thomas Hester; Raymond Anakwe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Comparison of treatment outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Hui Ju; Guang-Zhe Jin; Guan-Xing Li; Hai-Yang Hu; Rui-Xing Hou
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Retrospective comparison of percutaneous fixation and volar internal fixation of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Santiago A Lozano-Calderón; Job N Doornberg; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2007-09-18

Review 5.  [Distal radius fractures : Current treatment concepts and controversies].

Authors:  S Thelen; J-P Grassmann; P Jungbluth; J Windolf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  [Upper extremity fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  Roland Biber; S Grüninger; H J Bail
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 1.281

7.  Combined Volar T-Plate and Dorsal Pi-Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Consecutive Series of 80 AO type C2 and C3 Cases.

Authors:  Marcus Sagerfors; Patrik Bjorling; Johan Niklasson; Kurt Pettersson
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2019-01-15

8.  The treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Christoph Bartl; Dirk Stengel; Thomas Bruckner; Florian Gebhard
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Is there a Consensus in the Management of Distal Radial Fractures?

Authors:  M A Nazar; R Mansingh; R S Bassi; M Waseem
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2009-11-05

10.  Open reduction and internal fixation compared to closed reduction and external fixation in distal radial fractures: a randomized study of 50 patients.

Authors:  Antonio Abramo; Philippe Kopylov; Mats Geijer; Magnus Tägil
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.