Ji-Hui Ju1, Guang-Zhe Jin1, Guan-Xing Li1, Hai-Yang Hu1, Rui-Xing Hou2. 1. Department of Hand Surgery, Ruihua Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 5st Ta Yun Street, Suzhou, 215104, China. 2. Department of Hand Surgery, Ruihua Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 5st Ta Yun Street, Suzhou, 215104, China. gkswk2013@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The best treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly is uncertain. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of DRFs in persons 65 years of age or older. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until April 27, 2015 using the following search terms: distal radius fracture, conservative treatment, nonoperative treatment, nonsurgical treatment, surgical treatment, operative, elderly, and older. The primary outcome measure was DASH score, and secondary outcomes were functional and radiological assessments. The standard difference in post-treatment means was calculated for the outcomes to compare the two groups. RESULTS: Of 59 articles identified, eight studies with a total of 440 patients in the surgical groups and 449 in the control groups were included in the analysis. No significant differences in DASH score, VAS pain score, grip strength, wrist extension, pronation, or supination, and ulnar deviation were noted between the groups. The nonsurgical group had significantly greater wrist flexion, radial deviation, and ulnar variance and less radial inclination than the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical and nonsurgical methods produce similar results in the treatment of DRFS in the elderly, and minor objective functional differences did not result an impact on subjective function outcome and quality of life.
PURPOSE: The best treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly is uncertain. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of DRFs in persons 65 years of age or older. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until April 27, 2015 using the following search terms: distal radius fracture, conservative treatment, nonoperative treatment, nonsurgical treatment, surgical treatment, operative, elderly, and older. The primary outcome measure was DASH score, and secondary outcomes were functional and radiological assessments. The standard difference in post-treatment means was calculated for the outcomes to compare the two groups. RESULTS: Of 59 articles identified, eight studies with a total of 440 patients in the surgical groups and 449 in the control groups were included in the analysis. No significant differences in DASH score, VAS pain score, grip strength, wrist extension, pronation, or supination, and ulnar deviation were noted between the groups. The nonsurgical group had significantly greater wrist flexion, radial deviation, and ulnar variance and less radial inclination than the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical and nonsurgical methods produce similar results in the treatment of DRFS in the elderly, and minor objective functional differences did not result an impact on subjective function outcome and quality of life.
Authors: David H Wei; Rudolf W Poolman; Mohit Bhandari; Valerie M Wolfe; Melvin P Rosenwasser Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Jonathan A C Sterne; Alex J Sutton; John P A Ioannidis; Norma Terrin; David R Jones; Joseph Lau; James Carpenter; Gerta Rücker; Roger M Harbord; Christopher H Schmid; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Jonathan J Deeks; Jaime Peters; Petra Macaskill; Guido Schwarzer; Sue Duval; Douglas G Altman; David Moher; Julian P T Higgins Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-07-22
Authors: Alexandra Bruyere; Paul Vernet; Santiago Salazar Botero; Yuka Igeta; Juan José Hidalgo Diaz; Philippe Liverneaux Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2018-02-08
Authors: Andrew R Stephens; Angela P Presson; Mary M McFarland; Chong Zhang; Kai Sirniö; Marjolein A M Mulders; Niels W L Schep; Andrew R Tyser; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 6.558