Literature DB >> 12915644

Genetic determination of bone mineral density: evidence for a major gene.

Tuan V Nguyen1, Gregory Livshits, Jacqueline R Center, Konstantin Yakovenko, John A Eisman.   

Abstract

This study was designed to test the hypothesis of a major gene influence on the variation in bone mineral density (BMD). BMD and bone mineral content at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured in 330 men and 413 women, aged 18-90 yr, from 107 nuclear and complex families (including 5 large pedigrees with 194 individuals who were identified through an index case with moderately high BMD at the femoral neck (z-score, >or=1.28)). After adjusting for age and body weight, familial factors accounted for up to 72% of the total variation in BMD. In complex segregation analysis, for all variables examined the best-fitting most parsimonious model consistently suggested the Mendelian transmission of a major gene locus with significant residual correlations among siblings. This genetic model suggested that the proportion of a total variance (adjusted for significant covariates) attributable to a putative major gene effect ranged between 0.30 +/- 0.09 for femoral neck BMD and 0.53 +/- 0.07 for the principal component obtained on BMD and corresponding bone mineral content measures. These findings clearly support the hypothesis that a large component of the variance in BMD is under genetic control, with strong evidence for a major gene locus influencing BMD transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915644     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2002-030026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  6 in total

1.  Can Deep Learning Improve Genomic Prediction of Complex Human Traits?

Authors:  Pau Bellot; Gustavo de Los Campos; Miguel Pérez-Enciso
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Unique and common genetic effects between bone mineral density and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures: the Fels Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  M Lee; S A Czerwinski; A C Choh; E W Demerath; S S Sun; W C Chumlea; B Towne; R M Siervogel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The relationship between maternal and child bone density in Nigerian children with and without nutritional rickets.

Authors:  T J Bommersbach; P R Fischer; J M Pettifor; T D Thacher
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The effect of FokI vitamin D receptor polymorphism on bone mineral density in Jordanian perimenopausal women.

Authors:  Raed M Kanan
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04

5.  Determinants of bone mass and bone size in a large cohort of physically active young adult men.

Authors:  J A Ruffing; F Cosman; M Zion; Susan Tendy; P Garrett; R Lindsay; J W Nieves
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 4.169

6.  Association between LRP5 polymorphism and bone mineral density: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bich N H Tran; Nguyen D Nguyen; John A Eisman; Tuan V Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 2.103

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.