Literature DB >> 12912927

Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity.

Mohammed Bellaoui1, Michael Chang, Jiongwen Ou, Hong Xu, Charles Boone, Grant W Brown.   

Abstract

Genome-wide synthetic genetic interaction screens with mutants in the mus81 and mms4 replication fork-processing genes identified a novel replication factor C (RFC) homolog, Elg1, which forms an alternative RFC complex with Rfc2-5. This complex is distinct from the DNA replication RFC, the DNA damage checkpoint RFC and the sister chromatid cohesion RFC. As expected from its genetic interactions, elg1 mutants are sensitive to DNA damage. Elg1 is redundant with Rad24 in the DNA damage response and contributes to activation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53. We find that elg1 mutants display DNA replication defects and genome instability, including increased recombination and mutation frequencies, and minichromosome maintenance defects. Mutants in elg1 show genetic interactions with pathways required for processing of stalled replication forks, and are defective in recovery from DNA damage during S phase. We propose that Elg1-RFC functions both in normal DNA replication and in the DNA damage response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12912927      PMCID: PMC175796          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  63 in total

Review 1.  Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break".

Authors:  R Rothstein; B Michel; S Gangloff
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Getting started with yeast.

Authors:  F Sherman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gavin; Markus Bösche; Roland Krause; Paola Grandi; Martina Marzioch; Andreas Bauer; Jörg Schultz; Jens M Rick; Anne-Marie Michon; Cristina-Maria Cruciat; Marita Remor; Christian Höfert; Malgorzata Schelder; Miro Brajenovic; Heinz Ruffner; Alejandro Merino; Karin Klein; Manuela Hudak; David Dickson; Tatjana Rudi; Volker Gnau; Angela Bauch; Sonja Bastuck; Bettina Huhse; Christina Leutwein; Marie-Anne Heurtier; Richard R Copley; Angela Edelmann; Erich Querfurth; Vladimir Rybin; Gerard Drewes; Manfred Raida; Tewis Bouwmeester; Peer Bork; Bertrand Seraphin; Bernhard Kuster; Gitte Neubauer; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Minichromosome maintenance as a genetic assay for defects in DNA replication.

Authors:  B K Tye
Journal:  Methods       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  A G Paulovich; R U Margulies; B M Garvik; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Accumulation of single-stranded DNA and destabilization of telomeric repeats in yeast mutant strains carrying a deletion of RAD27.

Authors:  J Parenteau; R J Wellinger
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Functional and physical interaction between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the yeast checkpoint pathways.

Authors:  T Shimomura; S Ando; K Matsumoto; K Sugimoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  A proteomics approach to identify proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-binding proteins in human cell lysates. Identification of the human CHL12/RFCs2-5 complex as a novel PCNA-binding protein.

Authors:  Satoshi Ohta; Yasushi Shiomi; Katsunori Sugimoto; Chikashi Obuse; Toshiki Tsurimoto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Authors:  Rita S Cha; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  88 in total

1.  S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  Cheryl D Warren; D Mark Eckley; Marina S Lee; Joseph S Hanna; Adam Hughes; Brian Peyser; Chunfa Jie; Rafael Irizarry; Forrest A Spencer
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Stephanie Smith; Ji-Young Hwang; Soma Banerjee; Anju Majeed; Amitabha Gupta; Kyungjaem Myung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predicting protein complex membership using probabilistic network reliability.

Authors:  Saurabh Asthana; Oliver D King; Francis D Gibbons; Frederick P Roth
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Regulation of the DNA replication fork: a way to fight genomic instability.

Authors:  Magali Toueille; Ulrich Hübscher
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Endogenous DNA replication stress results in expansion of dNTP pools and a mutator phenotype.

Authors:  Marta B Davidson; Yuki Katou; Andrea Keszthelyi; Tina L Sing; Tian Xia; Jiongwen Ou; Jessica A Vaisica; Neroshan Thevakumaran; Lisette Marjavaara; Chad L Myers; Andrei Chabes; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Grant W Brown
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Physical links between the nuclear envelope protein Mps3, three alternate replication factor C complexes, and a variant histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jared Haas; Amanda Lemoncelli; Christina Morozov; Karl Franke; John Dominder; Lisa M Antoniacci
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.311

7.  Genome-wide analysis of cellular response to bacterial genotoxin CdtB in yeast.

Authors:  Takao Kitagawa; Hisashi Hoshida; Rinji Akada
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response.

Authors:  Laure Crabbé; Aubin Thomas; Véronique Pantesco; John De Vos; Philippe Pasero; Armelle Lengronne
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 9.  Host factors that control long terminal repeat retrotransposons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for regulation of mammalian retroviruses.

Authors:  Patrick H Maxwell; M Joan Curcio
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2007-05-11

10.  Genetic dissection of parallel sister-chromatid cohesion pathways.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Charles Boone; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.