Literature DB >> 12911042

The role of autopsy in the intensive care unit.

Hassan F Nadrous1, Bekele Afessa, Eric A Pfeifer, Steve G Peters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the frequency and spectrum of clinically relevant diagnoses found at autopsy but not determined before death in adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and autopsy reports of patients admitted to ICUs from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2000. Disagreements between autopsy and antemortem diagnoses were classified as type I or type II errors. A new major diagnosis with potential for directly impacting therapy was considered a type I error. Type II errors included important findings that would not have likely changed therapy.
RESULTS: Of 1597 deaths in all ICUs during the study period, autopsies were performed in 527 patients (33%). Autopsy reports were available in 455 patients, of whom 19 (4%) had type I errors and 78 (17%) had type II errors. The most common type I error was cardiac tamponade. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or length of stay in the ICU or hospital among patients with and without diagnostic errors or among patients with type I and II errors. Seventy-eight patients had 81 type II errors. Organ transplant recipients had more type I or II errors than did nontransplant patients (35% vs 20%; P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnoses with impact on therapy and outcome are missed in approximately 4% of deaths of adult patients admitted to the ICU. Transplant recipients are especially likely to have occult conditions for which additional therapy might be indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12911042     DOI: 10.4065/78.8.947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  8 in total

1.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Calliope Maris; Benoît Martin; Jacques Creteur; Myriam Remmelink; Michael Piagnerelli; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pieter Demetter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Infective and non-infective endocarditis in critically ill patients: a clinical-pathological study.

Authors:  Giorgio Berlot; Cristina Calderan; Cristina Fiorenza; Davide Cappelli; Stefano Addesa; Rossana Bussani
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 5.  Clinical review: What is the role for autopsy in the ICU?

Authors:  Greet Yvonne Agnes De Vlieger; Elien Marie Jeanne Lia Mahieu; Wouter Meersseman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Major discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill cancer patients: Is autopsy still useful?

Authors:  Owais Khawaja; Mohammad Khalil; Omar Zmeili; Ayman O Soubani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2013-07

7.  Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephen M Pastores; Alina Dulu; Louis Voigt; Nina Raoof; Margarita Alicea; Neil A Halpern
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Stefan Rusu; Philomène Lavis; Vilma Domingues Salgado; Marie-Paule Van Craynest; Jacques Creteur; Isabelle Salmon; Alexandre Brasseur; Myriam Remmelink
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 4.064

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.