Literature DB >> 12910383

Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of breast cancer.

B Bagni1, A Franceschetto, A Casolo, M De Santis, I Bagni, F Pansini, C Di Leo.   

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (99mTc-MIBI) scintimammography (SMM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with breast masses, using the histological findings as the gold standard. Forty-five consecutive patients with a breast lesion, detected by self-examination, physical examination or screening mammography, underwent SMM and MRI. In 38 cases (84.5%), the histopathology was malignant; the breast cancers ranged from 3 to 100 mm in diameter (mean 22 mm). In the overall patient group, MRI showed a slightly higher sensitivity than SMM (92% vs 84%), but SMM showed a better specificity: 71% vs 42%. The accuracy was 82% and 84% for SMM and MRI respectively. To evaluate the influence of lesion size on the results, patients with lesions < or =20 mm and < or =15 mm were examined. In patients with lesions < or =20 mm, the sensitivity of SMM and MRI decreased to 64% and 82% respectively, while SMM again displayed considerably better specificity: 83% vs 50% for MRI. The accuracy of SMM and MRI was 64% and 82% respectively. In patients with lesions < or =15 mm, SMM again showed better specificity (75% vs 50%), while MRI displayed better sensitivity and accuracy (sensitivity, 81% vs 62%; accuracy, 75% vs 65%). In this study the specificity of SMM in patients with breast lesions was thus superior to that of MRI. The combination of SMM and MRI may be used in those patients with equivocal findings at mammography and ultrasound to reduce the number of unnecessary surgical biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12910383     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1262-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  25 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of occult breast cancer.

Authors:  D R Baker
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  High-resolution scintimammography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rachel F Brem; Joelle M Schoonjans; Douglas A Kieper; Stan Majewski; Steven Goodman; Cahid Civelek
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Role of technetium-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of indeterminate mammograms.

Authors:  R Tiling; I Khalkhali; H Sommer; R Moser; G Meyer; F Willemsen; T Pfluger; K Tatsch; K Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-10

4.  Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI versus dynamic MRI for non-invasive characterization of breast masses.

Authors:  M Imbriaco; S Del Vecchio; A Riccardi; L Pace; F Di Salle; F Di Gennaro; M Salvatore; A Sodano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-01

5.  Expression of a multidrug resistance gene in human cancers.

Authors:  L J Goldstein; H Galski; A Fojo; M Willingham; S L Lai; A Gazdar; R Pirker; A Green; W Crist; G M Brodeur
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-01-18       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the axilla in women with breast cancer: comparison with pathology of excised nodes.

Authors:  A D Murray; R T Staff; T W Redpath; F J Gilbert; A K Ah-See; J A Brookes; I D Miller; S Payne
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Differential diagnosis of solid breast lesions: contribution of Doppler studies to mammography and gray scale imaging.

Authors:  A Ozdemir; H Ozdemir; I Maral; O Konuş; S Yücel; S Işik
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses.

Authors:  Kenneth J W Taylor; Christopher Merritt; Catherine Piccoli; Robert Schmidt; Glenn Rouse; Bruno Fornage; Eva Rubin; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Fred Winsberg; Barry Goldberg; Ellen Mendelson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Prone scintimammography in patients with suspicion of carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  I Khalkhali; I Mena; E Jouanne; L Diggles; R Venegas; J Block; K Alle; S Klein
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Focal breast uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi in a man with spindle cell lipoma.

Authors:  H Malek; T Ghaedian; N Yaghoobi; F Rastgou; A Bitarafan-Rajabi; H Firoozabadi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  An X-Ray computed tomography/positron emission tomography system designed specifically for breast imaging.

Authors:  John M Boone; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Nathan J Packard; Shih-ying Huang; Spencer Bowen; Ramsey D Badawi; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.