Literature DB >> 8167887

Prone scintimammography in patients with suspicion of carcinoma of the breast.

I Khalkhali1, I Mena, E Jouanne, L Diggles, R Venegas, J Block, K Alle, S Klein.   

Abstract

Mammography and physical examination have a sensitivity of 85 percent for detection of carcinoma of the breast. Mammography also has a positive predictive value of 15 to 30 percent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of scintimammography (SMM) as a screening technique for the detection of carcinoma of the breast and compare the test's sensitivity and specificity with that of mammography. We conducted SMM on 59 female patients in whom abnormal mammogram and physical examination warranted biopsy of the breast or fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast, or both. Each patient received 20 millicuries of 99mTc Sestamibi intravenously. Five and sixty minutes postinjection, planar breast images in lateral and posterior oblique views were obtained. In 23 patients with biopsy-confirmed carcinoma of the breast, the SMM result was positive. In 33 patients with benign breast lesions, no increased uptake of Sestamibi was noted in the breast. Five other patients with benign lesions of the breast had false-positive scans. There was one patient with an intraductal carcinoma and a cluster of microcalcifications on mammography without an associated mass, for whom the 99mTc Sestamibi scan was negative. In the group of patients studied, the sensitivity of SMM was 95.8 percent, specificity was 86.8 percent, positive predictive value was 82.1 percent and, most importantly, the negative predictive value for the detection of carcinoma of the breast was 97.1 percent. We conclude in this pilot study that SMM is a highly sensitive test that improves the specificity of conventional mammography for the detection of carcinoma of the breast and deserves further study as a screening technique to potentially reduce the number of mammographically "indicated" biopsies of the breast that yield negative results for carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8167887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  23 in total

1.  Diagnostic efficiency of sestamibi gammagraphy and Doppler sonography in the preoperative assessment of breast lesions.

Authors:  Antonio Piñero; Pedro José Galindo; Julián Illana; Francisco Nicolás; Manuel Reus; María Dolores Hernández; Isidro Durán; Manuel Canteras; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  [Functional and molecular imaging of breast tumors].

Authors:  K Pinker; P Brader; G Karanikas; K El-Rabadi; W Bogner; S Gruber; M Reisegger; S Trattnig; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) with 99 technetium sestamibi in the diagnosis of small breast cancer and axillary node involvement.

Authors:  Hans Jacobsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintigraphy used to evaluate tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: A quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Katia Hiromoto Koga; Sonia Marta Moriguchi; Jorge Nahás Neto; Stela Verzinhasse Peres; Eduardo Tinóis DA Silva; Almir José Sarri; Odair Carlito Michelin; Mariangela Esther Alencar Marques; Beatriz Lotufo Griva
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  The use of technetium-99m sestamibi to indicate breast cancer invasiveness.

Authors:  P Bourgeois
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-06

7.  Scintimammography as an adjunctive breast imaging technology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-04-01

8.  Breast scintigraphy today: indications and limitations.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; John R Buscombe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Bagni; A Franceschetto; A Casolo; M De Santis; I Bagni; F Pansini; C Di Leo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  K Scheidhauer; C Walter; M D Seemann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.