Literature DB >> 11202453

Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI versus dynamic MRI for non-invasive characterization of breast masses.

M Imbriaco1, S Del Vecchio, A Riccardi, L Pace, F Di Salle, F Di Gennaro, M Salvatore, A Sodano.   

Abstract

Although mammography remains the technique of choice for the early detection of breast cancer, several imaging techniques, including scintimammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have recently been proposed as adjuncts for this purpose and included in many diagnostic protocols. This study was undertaken to assess the clinical accuracy of scintimammography with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) and contrast-enhanced MRI in the detection of primary breast carcinoma in patients with equivocal mammographic findings. Forty-nine patients with a suspicious breast mass detected either by physical examination or by mammography and ultrasound (US) were studied. All patients underwent scintimammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI 1 week apart. The results of the two techniques were compared and correlated to the final diagnoses. Two independent readers reported the scans using a four-point confidence scale. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained. Scintimammography showed an accuracy for tumour detection of 84%, with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88%. MRI showed an accuracy of 86%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 75%, respectively. Comparison of the two areas under the ROC curves showed no significant differences between MRI, 0.91+/-0.05 (mean+/-SD), and scintimammography, 0.88+/-0.05 (P=0.9). It is concluded that dynamic MRI and scintimammography possess comparable accuracy in the diagnosis of primary breast carcinoma in patients with equivocal mammographic or US findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11202453     DOI: 10.1007/s002590000411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  6 in total

1.  Breast scintigraphy: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Cumali Aktolun; Richard P Baum; Angelika Bishof-Delaloye; John Buscombe; Jean François Chatal; Lorenzo Maffioli; Roy Moncayo; Luc Mortelmans; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Comparison of breast specific gamma imaging and molecular breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection: Evaluation in phantoms.

Authors:  Zongyi Gong; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Underscoring the influence of inorganic chemistry on nuclear imaging with radiometals.

Authors:  Brian M Zeglis; Jacob L Houghton; Michael J Evans; Nerissa Viola-Villegas; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Bagni; A Franceschetto; A Casolo; M De Santis; I Bagni; F Pansini; C Di Leo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Breast imaging in the new era.

Authors:  K Planche; S Vinnicombe
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Clinical decision modeling system.

Authors:  Haiwen Shi; James Lyons-Weiler
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.