Literature DB >> 12907009

Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer.

Jenny C Chang1, Eric C Wooten, Anna Tsimelzon, Susan G Hilsenbeck, M Carolina Gutierrez, Richard Elledge, Syed Mohsin, C Kent Osborne, Gary C Chamness, D Craig Allred, Peter O'Connell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy for operable breast cancer substantially decreases the risk of death. Patients often have de novo resistance or incomplete response to docetaxel, one of the most active agents in this disease. We postulated that gene expression profiles of the primary breast cancer can predict the response to docetaxel.
METHODS: We took core biopsy samples from primary breast tumours in 24 patients before treatment and then assessed tumour response to neoadjuvant docetaxel (four cycles, 100 mg/m2 daily for 3 weeks) by cDNA analysis of RNA extracted from biopsy samples using HgU95-Av2 GeneChip.
FINDINGS: From the core biopsy samples, we extracted sufficient total RNA (3-6 microg) for cDNA array analysis using HgU95-Av2 GeneChip. Differential patterns of expression of 92 genes correlated with docetaxel response (p=0.001). Sensitive tumours had higher expression of genes involved in cell cycle, cytoskeleton, adhesion, protein transport, protein modification, transcription, and stress or apoptosis; whereas resistant tumours showed increased expression of some transcriptional and signal transduction genes. In leave-one-out cross-validation analysis, ten of 11 sensitive tumours (90% specificity) and 11 of 13 resistant tumours (85% sensitivity) were correctly classified, with an accuracy of 88%. This 92-gene predictor had positive and negative predictive values of 92% and 83%, respectively. Correlation between RNA expression measured by the arrays and semiquantitative RT-PCR was also ascertained, and our results were validated in an independent set of six patients.
INTERPRETATION: If validated, these molecular profiles could allow development of a clinical test for docetaxel sensitivity, thus reducing unnecessary treatment for women with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12907009     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14023-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  190 in total

1.  PMCA2 regulates apoptosis during mammary gland involution and predicts outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Joshua VanHouten; Catherine Sullivan; Caroline Bazinet; Tom Ryoo; Robert Camp; David L Rimm; Gina Chung; John Wysolmerski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Molecular biology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Cellular senescence in cancer treatment: friend or foe?

Authors:  Pascal Kahlem; Bernd Dörken; Clemens A Schmitt
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Role of gene expression arrays in sarcomas.

Authors:  Keith M Skubitz; Amy P N Skubitz
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  There's a goat behind door number 3: from Monty Hall to medicine.

Authors:  David J Friedman; Laurence A Turka; Simon C Robson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Gene-expression profiling in breast cancer: bespoke cancer therapy or more fiction than science?

Authors:  M Barry; M R Kell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 7.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Pharmacogenomics of tamoxifen in a nutshell-and who broke the nutcracker?

Authors:  Frankie Ann Holmes; Jeffrey D Liticker
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Adaptive prediction model in prospective molecular signature-based clinical studies.

Authors:  Guanghua Xiao; Shuangge Ma; John Minna; Yang Xie
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Data-driven methods to discover molecular determinants of serious adverse drug events.

Authors:  A P Chiang; A J Butte
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.