Literature DB >> 24323903

Adaptive prediction model in prospective molecular signature-based clinical studies.

Guanghua Xiao1, Shuangge Ma, John Minna, Yang Xie.   

Abstract

Use of molecular profiles and clinical information can help predict which treatment would give the best outcome and survival for each individual patient, and thus guide optimal therapy, which offers great promise for the future of clinical trials and practice. High prediction accuracy is essential for selecting the best treatment plan. The gold standard for evaluating the prediction models is prospective clinical studies, in which patients are enrolled sequentially. However, there is no statistical method using this sequential feature to adapt the prediction model to the current patient cohort. In this article, we propose a reweighted random forest (RWRF) model, which updates the weight of each decision tree whenever additional patient information is available, to account for the potential heterogeneity between training and testing data. A simulation study and a lung cancer example are used to show that the proposed method can adapt the prediction model to current patients' characteristics, and, therefore, can improve prediction accuracy significantly. We also show that the proposed method can identify important and consistent predictive variables. Compared with rebuilding the prediction model, the RWRF updates a well-tested model gradually, and all of the adaptive procedure/parameters used in the RWRF model are prespecified before patient recruitment, which are important practical advantages for prospective clinical studies. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24323903      PMCID: PMC3946561          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

1.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias.

Authors:  B M Bolstad; R A Irizarry; M Astrand; T P Speed
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Cancer. A bull's eye for targeted lung cancer therapy.

Authors:  John D Minna; Adi F Gazdar; Stephen R Sprang; Joachim Herz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy.

Authors:  Stefan Michiels; Serge Koscielny; Catherine Hill
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Feb 5-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Barbara A Conley; Carmen Allegra; Laurence Collette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Circulating angiogenic cytokines in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with treatment response and survival.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Z Dudek; Hemchandra Mahaseth
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.

Authors:  J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Towards integrated clinico-genomic models for personalized medicine: combining gene expression signatures and clinical factors in breast cancer outcomes prediction.

Authors:  Joseph R Nevins; Erich S Huang; Holly Dressman; Jennifer Pittman; Andrew T Huang; Mike West
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Phase I pharmacokinetic trial of the selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839) in Japanese patients with solid malignant tumors.

Authors:  K Nakagawa; T Tamura; S Negoro; S Kudoh; N Yamamoto; N Yamamoto; K Takeda; H Swaisland; I Nakatani; M Hirose; R-P Dong; M Fukuoka
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jenny C Chang; Eric C Wooten; Anna Tsimelzon; Susan G Hilsenbeck; M Carolina Gutierrez; Richard Elledge; Syed Mohsin; C Kent Osborne; Gary C Chamness; D Craig Allred; Peter O'Connell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  CD24 is an independent prognostic marker of survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  G Kristiansen; K Schlüns; Y Yongwei; C Denkert; M Dietel; I Petersen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Optimal design of trials to demonstrate the utility of genomically-guided therapy: Putting Precision Cancer Medicine to the test.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dienstmann; Jordi Rodon; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Ensembled machine learning framework for drug sensitivity prediction.

Authors:  Aman Sharma; Rinkle Rani
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.615

Review 3.  New clinical trial designs in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Elena Garralda; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Alejandro Piris-Giménez; Irene Braña; Jordi Rodon; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Medicine in Neoplasms: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sorayya Rezayi; Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori; Soheila Saeedi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Predicting Anticancer Drug Responses Using a Dual-Layer Integrated Cell Line-Drug Network Model.

Authors:  Naiqian Zhang; Haiyun Wang; Yun Fang; Jun Wang; Xiaoqi Zheng; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Improved anticancer drug response prediction in cell lines using matrix factorization with similarity regularization.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Xiaozhong Li; Louxin Zhang; Qiang Gao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Pathology Image Analysis.

Authors:  Shidan Wang; Donghan M Yang; Ruichen Rong; Xiaowei Zhan; Junya Fujimoto; Hongyu Liu; John Minna; Ignacio Ivan Wistuba; Yang Xie; Guanghua Xiao
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.