Literature DB >> 12906208

A systematic study of imaging uncertainties and their impact on 125I prostate brachytherapy dose evaluation.

Patricia E Lindsay1, Jake Van Dyk, Jerry J Battista.   

Abstract

In order to calculate the dose distribution delivered by a prostate brachytherapy implant, the seed positions and prostate volume are normally identified on post-implant CT images. We have systematically considered the impact of uncertainties in contouring the prostate, seed localization, and visualization of all the seeds on the calculated dose distributions, dose-volume histograms, and predicted radiobiological outcome. This study was done for a collection of 27 clinical 125I prostate brachytherapy implants, performed at the London Regional Cancer Centre during our early adoption of this technique. For these clinical dose distributions, the median D90 was 76% of the prescription dose, or 110 Gy, and the median V90 was 80%. We calculated the changes in these dosimetric indices (D90 and V90) and radiobiological outcome (SF2 TCP) as a function of contouring uncertainty, seed localization uncertainty, inability to localize all of the seeds, and binary combinations of these three. The results are presented for a range of uncertainties, which allows the possible application of these results to a variety of imaging modalities that have differing spatial resolutions. We found that both contouring uncertainties and seed localization uncertainties had a large impact on the predicted radiobiological outcome, but that seed localization uncertainties of 6 mm had the largest impact on the dosimetric indices. We also found that the variability in both the predicted radiobiological and dosimetric outcome was largest for contouring uncertainties of 4-8 mm. We conclude that accounting for contouring uncertainties is crucial in accurately deducing the DVHs for post-implant prostate brachytherapy, and hence enabling valid correlation with ultimate clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12906208     DOI: 10.1118/1.1586451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Prostate implant reconstruction from C-arm images with motion-compensated tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Ehsan Dehghan; Mehdi Moradi; Xu Wen; Danny French; Julio Lobo; W James Morris; Septimiu E Salcudean; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant magnetic resonance imaging dosimetry using positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging markers.

Authors:  Geoffrey V Martin; Thomas J Pugh; Usama Mahmood; Rajat J Kudchadker; Jihong Wang; Teresa L Bruno; Tharakeswara Bathala; Pierre Blanchard; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Ultrasound-fluoroscopy registration for prostate brachytherapy dosimetry.

Authors:  Ehsan Dehghan; Junghoon Lee; Pascal Fallavollita; Nathanael Kuo; Anton Deguet; Yi Le; E Clif Burdette; Danny Y Song; Jerry L Prince; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Post-implant computed tomography-magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information.

Authors:  Sandra Vidakovic; Hans S Jans; Abe Alexander; Ron S Sloboda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: analysis guidelines of GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM.

Authors:  Christian Kirisits; Mark J Rivard; Dimos Baltas; Facundo Ballester; Marisol De Brabandere; Rob van der Laarse; Yury Niatsetski; Panagiotis Papagiannis; Taran Paulsen Hellebust; Jose Perez-Calatayud; Kari Tanderup; Jack L M Venselaar; Frank-André Siebert
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 6.280

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.