Literature DB >> 1582359

Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.

Y Katsura1, K Yamada, T Ishizawa, H Yoshinaka, H Shimazu.   

Abstract

Endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) with a flexible-type radial scanner (Aloka Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; 7.5 MHz) was applied to 120 patients with rectal cancer for the assessment of wall invasion and pararectal lymph node metastasis. Normal rectal wall was described as a five- or seven-layer structure excluding the lowest part within 3 cm from the anal verge. Loss of normal layers basically indicated the existence of cancer invasion. According to UICC classification, we divided the depth of wall invasion into four ultrasonographic levels (uT1-uT4), and results were correlated with histopathologic findings. Overall accuracy of the assessment was 92.0 percent (103/112). Overestimation occurred in 5 of 60 cases with T3 cancer (8.3 percent), and underestimation occurred in 1 of 19 cases with T2 cancer (5.3 percent) and 3 of 60 cases with T3 cancer (5 percent). Inflammatory cell infiltration was found around the cancer in a considerable number of cases. However, the assessment of wall invasion was hardly affected in our hands. Because the muscularis propria of the rectal wall was often recognized as a three-layer structure, uT2 cancer was subdivided into three subgroups of uPM1, uPM2, and uPM3. The assessment of invasion of sublayers in muscularis propria was possible in 14 of 19 cases (73.7 percent), and correct assessment was achieved in 57 percent of the cases. The ultrasonographic demonstration of pararectal lymph nodes was studied on 98 patients. No swollen lymph nodes were detected ultrasonographically in 35 of 98 cases (35.7 percent), but cancer metastasis was found histopathologically in 5 of these 35 cases (14.3 percent). The metastasis was observed more frequently in lymph nodes with a diameter of more than 5 mm (53.8 percent) and in those with a well-defined boundary and with an uneven and markedly hypoechoic pattern (72.3 percent). Although unable to detect minimal cancer foci. ERUS was considered a very useful tool for the assessment of the depth of cancer invasion in the rectal wall and pararectal lymph node metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1582359     DOI: 10.1007/bf02048115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  12 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

2.  Learning curve of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zuo-Liang Liu; Tong Zhou; Xiao-Bo Liang; Jun-Jie Ma; Guang-Jun Zhang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-17

3.  The impact of lymph node size to predict nodal metastasis in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Im-Kyung Kim; Jeonghyun Kang; Beom Jin Lim; Seung-Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonography used in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  J C Kim; Y K Cho; S Y Kim; S K Park; M G Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasound: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  S A Badger; P B Devlin; P J D Neilly; R Gilliland
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Role of three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography in the assessment of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Sthela M Murad-Regadas; Francisco Sergio P Regadas; Lusmar V Rodrigues; Rosilma G L Barreto; Francisco Coracy C Monteiro; Beethoven B Landim; Erico C Holanda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  The value of endosonographic rectal carcinoma staging in routine diagnostics: a 10-year analysis.

Authors:  W K H Kauer; L Prantl; H J Dittler; J R Siewert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Endorectal ultrasonography for staging small rectal tumors: technique and contribution to treatment.

Authors:  R J Detry; A Kartheuser; P J Kestens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Transanal local resection for benign and malignant rectal tumours.

Authors:  E E Piccinini; G Ugolini; G Rosati; A Conti
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin?

Authors:  R G H Beets-Tan; G L Beets
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.