Literature DB >> 9272450

The value of endorectal ultrasound in the assessment of adenomas, T1- and T2-carcinomas.

M Sailer1, R Leppert, M Kraemer, K H Fuchs, A Thiede.   

Abstract

In a prospective study we examined the value of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) in the preoperative staging of potentially locally excisable tumours. During the study period from 1.1.1991 to 1.3.1996 a total of 160 rectal tumours in 152 patients were staged endosonographically (uT/uN) and compared postoperatively with the histologic result (pT/pN) at the University Hospital of Würzburg. Thirty-eight (24%) patients had an adenoma and 15 (9%) a T1-carcinoma. In 29 (18%) cases a T2-cancer was diagnosed, further 67 (42%) and 11 (7%) patients presented with a T3 and T4 tumour, respectively. The sensitivity for adenomas and T1-Ca (uT0/1) was 81%, the specificity 98%. For T2 tumours, the sensitivity was only 41% and the specificity 92% as the majority (17 of 29) of pT2 neoplasias were overstaged (uT3). The overall staging accuracy (T1-4) was 77.5%. Two patients with a pT1-Ca and seven with a pT2-Ca had lymph node metastases which were detected preoperatively in five. The accuracy for lymph node staging was 83%. We conclude that adenomas and T1 tumours can be assessed with a high grade of accuracy using ERUS. In these tumours ERUS can be used to assist clinical decision-making (transanal vs. abdominal operation). Owing to the lack of sensitivity ERUS is of no help in the assessment of T2 carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9272450     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

2.  Does a learning curve exist in endorectal two-dimensional ultrasound accuracy?

Authors:  O J Morris; B Draganic; S Smith
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Can endoscopic ultrasound predict early rectal cancers that can be resected endoscopically? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Matthew L Bechtold; Jyotsna B K Reddy; Abhishek Choudhary; Mainor R Antillon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Prospective phase II study of preoperative short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer with twice daily fractions of 2.9 Gy to a total dose of 29 Gy--long-term results.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Joern Wulf; Andreas Thalheimer; Daniel Wehner; Arnulf Thiede; Gottfried Müller; Marco Sailer; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  [Selection of patients with rectal tumors for local excision based on preoperative diagnosis. Results of a consecutive evaluation study of 552 patients].

Authors:  W Kneist; A Terzic; J Burghardt; A Heintz; T Junginger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  [Transanal endoscopic operation: indications and technique].

Authors:  M Sailer; C Möllmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin?

Authors:  R G H Beets-Tan; G L Beets
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.