Literature DB >> 12901399

Impact of intended emotion intensity on cue utilization and decoding accuracy in vocal expression of emotion.

P N Juslin1, P Laukka.   

Abstract

Actors vocally portrayed happiness, sadness, anger, fear, and disgust with weak and strong emotion intensity while reading brief verbal phrases aloud. The portrayals were recorded and analyzed according to 20 acoustic cues. Listeners decoded each portrayal by using forced-choice or quantitative ratings. The results showed that (a) portrayals with strong emotion intensity yielded higher decoding accuracy than portrayals with weak intensity, (b) listeners were able to decode the intensity of portrayals, (c) portrayals of the same emotion with different intensity yielded different patterns of acoustic cues, and (d) certain acoustic cues (e.g., fundamental frequency, high-frequency energy) were highly predictive of listeners' ratings of emotion intensity. It is argued that lack of control for emotion intensity may account for some of the inconsistencies in cue utilization reported in the literature.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12901399     DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.4.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  62 in total

Review 1.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Emotion recognition deficits as predictors of transition in individuals at clinical high risk for schizophrenia: a neurodevelopmental perspective.

Authors:  C M Corcoran; J G Keilp; J Kayser; C Klim; P D Butler; G E Bruder; R C Gur; D C Javitt
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Judgments of Emotion in Clear and Conversational Speech by Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Shae D Morgan; Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Reduction in tonal discriminations predicts receptive emotion processing deficits in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

Authors:  Joshua T Kantrowitz; David I Leitman; Jonathan M Lehrfeld; Petri Laukka; Patrik N Juslin; Pamela D Butler; Gail Silipo; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Auditory emotion recognition impairments in schizophrenia: relationship to acoustic features and cognition.

Authors:  Rinat Gold; Pamela Butler; Nadine Revheim; David I Leitman; John A Hansen; Ruben C Gur; Joshua T Kantrowitz; Petri Laukka; Patrik N Juslin; Gail S Silipo; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Hierarchical deficits in auditory information processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Clément Dondé; Gail Silipo; Elisa C Dias; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Supplementing intensive targeted computerized cognitive training with social cognitive exercises for people with schizophrenia: An interim report.

Authors:  Melissa Fisher; Mor Nahum; Elizabeth Howard; Abby Rowlands; Benjamin Brandrett; Amy Kermott; Joshua Woolley; Sophia Vinogradov
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2017-03

8.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The 5% difference: early sensory processing predicts sarcasm perception in schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder.

Authors:  J T Kantrowitz; M J Hoptman; D I Leitman; G Silipo; D C Javitt
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  "It's Not What You Say, But How You Say it": A Reciprocal Temporo-frontal Network for Affective Prosody.

Authors:  David I Leitman; Daniel H Wolf; J Daniel Ragland; Petri Laukka; James Loughead; Jeffrey N Valdez; Daniel C Javitt; Bruce I Turetsky; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.