Literature DB >> 12898281

Comparison between central corneal thickness and IOP in patients with macrodiscs with physiologic macrocup and normal-sized vital discs.

Arne Viestenz1, Nina Wakili, Anselm G M Jünemann, Folkert K Horn, Christian Y Mardin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Macrodiscs with physiologic macrocups and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) are frequently suspicious for glaucoma. Patients with an elevated c/d ratio and an IOP of more than 21 mmHg are often treated for glaucoma. We investigated a possible relationship between macrodiscs, IOP and central corneal thickness.
METHODS: Using the Erlangen glaucoma registry, 341 out of 1,096 consecutive patients with unremarkable and repeated visual field (Octopus 500, G1-3, MD<2.1) were selected. Most of these patients had been sent as glaucoma suspects. The following data were collected: corneal ultrasound pachymetry (Tomey, AL-2000), IOP profile, visual acuity and central corneal power. The morphometric analysis was performed by planimetry using the Littmann formula. Optic nerve heads with a disc area of more than 3.1 mm(2) were defined as macrodiscs.
RESULTS: Patients were subdivided into the following groups: group A: healthy macrodiscs, IOP <22 mmHg (87 patients); group B: healthy macrodiscs, IOP >21 mmHg (66 patients); group C: normal-sized healthy discs, IOP <22 mmHg (93 patients); group D: normal-sized healthy discs, IOP >21 mmHg (95 patients). Mean corneal thickness was: group A: 575+/-36 microm, group B: 596+/-37 microm, group C: 557+/-31 microm and group D: 585+/-38 microm ( P=0.003). Mean central corneal power measured: group A: 41.7+/-1.3 D, group B: 42.4+/-1.3 D, group C: 43.0+/-1.2 D and group D: 42.8+/-1.2 D ( P<0.05). The maximum of IOP was: group A: 17.6+/-3.1, group B: 26.2+/-4.1, group C: 17.2+/-3.4 and group D: 29.7+/-5.5 mmHg. Optic disc size measurements were: group A: 3.91+/-0.66, group B: 3.65+/-0.6, group C: 2.56+/-0.30 mm(2) and group D: 2.39+/-0.39 microm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Macrodiscs with elevated IOP have a higher corneal curvature (mean: +0.7 D) and a thicker central cornea (mean: +21 microm) compared to macrodiscs without elevated IOP. An exact evaluation of optic disc morphology in combination with pachymetric and keratometric measurements in relation to IOP could avoid an overtreatment in patients with suspect primary open-angle glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898281     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-003-0736-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  22 in total

1.  [Central corneal thickness in normal eyes, patients with ocular hypertension, normal-pressure and open-angle glaucomas--a clinical study].

Authors:  I M Velten; A Bergua; F K Horn; A Jünemann; M Korth
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 0.700

2.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 3.  Tonometry and corneal thickness.

Authors:  R F Brubaker
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01

4.  Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Y Morad; E Sharon; L Hefetz; P Nemet
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry.

Authors:  H H Mark
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Pseudoglaucomatous physiologic large cups.

Authors:  J B Jonas; F M Zäch; G C Gusek; G O Naumann
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  [Primary open angle glaucoma in cornea plana masked by false normal applanation tonometry (Goldman) - a case report].

Authors:  A Hafner; B Seitz
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 0.700

8.  Macrodiscs in eyes with flat and large corneas.

Authors:  J B Jonas; K A Königsreuther
Journal:  Ger J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-05

9.  [Determination of the real size of an object on the fundus of the living eye].

Authors:  H Littmann
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 0.700

10.  Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness.

Authors:  W A Argus
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Central corneal thickness and correlation to optic disc size: a potential link for susceptibility to glaucoma.

Authors:  M Pakravan; A Parsa; M Sanagou; C F Parsa
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Effects of central corneal thickness, central corneal power, and axial length on intraocular pressure measurement assessed with goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Sayime Aydın; Nevin Uzgören
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Influence of optic disc size on parameters of retinal nerve fiber analysis with laser scanning polarimetry.

Authors:  Robert Laemmer; Folkert K Horn; Arne Viestenz; Anselm G Juenemann; Christian Y Mardin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 3.117

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.