Literature DB >> 11098456

[Central corneal thickness in normal eyes, patients with ocular hypertension, normal-pressure and open-angle glaucomas--a clinical study].

I M Velten1, A Bergua, F K Horn, A Jünemann, M Korth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relation between Goldmann applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness (CCT) was investigated in several studies during the last thirty years. It was the aim of the present study to evaluate CCT in normals, patients with ocular hypertension, low-tension, and open-angle glaucomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CCT was measured in 135 normal eyes, 137 with ocular hypertension, 65 with low-tension, and 94 with primary and secondary open-angle glaucomas using the AL-11000-pachymeter (Tomey). The results were compared using the unpaired t-test.
RESULTS: CCT was significantly higher in the patients with ocular hypertension (586 +/- 43 microns) than in the normal group (566 +/- 37 microns, p < 0.0001), in low-tension glaucomas (555 +/- 46 microns, p < 0.0001), and in open-angle glaucomas (558 +/- 31 microns, p < 0.0001). The latter three groups did not differ significantly. There was no significant correlation between CCT and age, the actually measured IOP, the highest IOP in the patient's history, or the spherical equivalent.
CONCLUSIONS: Only patients with ocular hypertension showed a significant difference in CCT compared with normals. Pachymetry thus should be conducted in those patients to avoid overestimation of the IOP by applanation tonometry. In most of the patients with low-tension and open-angle glaucomas however, CCT regarded without other parameters (e.g. corneal or scleral rigidity) plays a minor role in detection of elevated IOP according to the results of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11098456     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-10352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  7 in total

1.  [Medicinal glaucoma therapy. What can we learn from large randomized clinical trials?].

Authors:  A G M Jünemann; C Huchzermeyer; R Rejdak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Glaucoma diagnostics and corneal thickness].

Authors:  J von Eicken; M Kohlhaas; H Höh
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Central corneal thickness in adult Chinese. Association with ocular and general parameters. The Beijing Eye Study.

Authors:  Haitao Zhang; Liang Xu; Changxi Chen; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Josephine Wachtl; Marc Töteberg-Harms; Sonja Frimmel; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Comparison between central corneal thickness and IOP in patients with macrodiscs with physiologic macrocup and normal-sized vital discs.

Authors:  Arne Viestenz; Nina Wakili; Anselm G M Jünemann; Folkert K Horn; Christian Y Mardin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Evolution of central corneal thickness in children with congenital glaucoma requiring glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Isabel Oberacher-Velten; Christopher Prasser; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Central and paracentral corneal pachymetry in patients with normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Jens F Jordan; Silke Joergens; Sven Dinslage; Thomas S Dietlein; Günter K Krieglstein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.535

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.