Literature DB >> 30415705

Purging of Strongly Deleterious Mutations Explains Long-Term Persistence and Absence of Inbreeding Depression in Island Foxes.

Jacqueline A Robinson1, Caitlin Brown2, Bernard Y Kim2, Kirk E Lohmueller3, Robert K Wayne2.   

Abstract

The recovery and persistence of rare and endangered species are often threatened by genetic factors, such as the accumulation of deleterious mutations, loss of adaptive potential, and inbreeding depression [1]. Island foxes (Urocyon littoralis), the dwarfed descendants of mainland gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), have inhabited California's Channel Islands for >9,000 years [2-4]. Previous genomic analyses revealed that island foxes have exceptionally low levels of diversity and elevated levels of putatively deleterious variation [5]. Nonetheless, all six populations have persisted for thousands of generations, and several populations rebounded rapidly after recent severe bottlenecks [6, 7]. Here, we combine morphological and genomic data with population-genetic simulations to determine the mechanism underlying the enigmatic persistence of these foxes. First, through analysis of genomes from 1929 to 2009, we show that island foxes have remained at small population sizes with low diversity for many generations. Second, we present morphological data indicating an absence of inbreeding depression in island foxes, confirming that they are not afflicted with congenital defects common to other small and inbred populations. Lastly, our population-genetic simulations suggest that long-term small population size results in a reduced burden of strongly deleterious recessive alleles, providing a mechanism for the absence of inbreeding depression in island foxes. Importantly, the island fox illustrates a scenario in which genetic restoration through human-assisted gene flow could be a counterproductive or even harmful conservation strategy. Our study sheds light on the puzzle of island fox persistence, a unique success story that provides a model for the preservation of small populations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Channel Islands; deleterious variation; genetic diversity; genomics; gray fox; inbreeding depression; island evolution; island fox; skeletal morphology; small populations

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30415705      PMCID: PMC6462144          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  Peter Crnokrak; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Bottlenecks and selective sweeps during domestication have increased deleterious genetic variation in dogs.

Authors:  Clare D Marsden; Diego Ortega-Del Vecchyo; Dennis P O'Brien; Jeremy F Taylor; Oscar Ramirez; Carles Vilà; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Robert D Schnabel; Robert K Wayne; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  SLiM 2: Flexible, Interactive Forward Genetic Simulations.

Authors:  Benjamin C Haller; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data.

Authors:  Xiuwen Zheng; David Levine; Jess Shen; Stephanie M Gogarten; Cathy Laurie; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Traumatic, degenerative, and developmental lesions in wolves and coyotes from Saskatchewan.

Authors:  G Wobeser
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.535

6.  Genomic Flatlining in the Endangered Island Fox.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Robinson; Diego Ortega-Del Vecchyo; Zhenxin Fan; Bernard Y Kim; Bridgett M vonHoldt; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.

Authors:  Bernard Y Kim; Christian D Huber; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Extensive gains and losses of olfactory receptor genes in mammalian evolution.

Authors:  Yoshihito Niimura; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  SNPhylo: a pipeline to construct a phylogenetic tree from huge SNP data.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Hui Guo; Xiyin Wang; Changsoo Kim; Andrew H Paterson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Efficient Coalescent Simulation and Genealogical Analysis for Large Sample Sizes.

Authors:  Jerome Kelleher; Alison M Etheridge; Gilean McVean
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  26 in total

1.  Complex patterns of sex-biased demography in canines.

Authors:  Tanya N Phung; Robert K Wayne; Melissa A Wilson; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Unbiased Estimation of Linkage Disequilibrium from Unphased Data.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale; Simon Gravel
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Aquatic Adaptation and Depleted Diversity: A Deep Dive into the Genomes of the Sea Otter and Giant Otter.

Authors:  Annabel C Beichman; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Gang Li; William Murphy; Pasha Dobrynin; Sergei Kliver; Martin T Tinker; Michael J Murray; Jeremy Johnson; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Elinor K Karlsson; Kirk E Lohmueller; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation.

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Ellie E Armstrong; Sarah W Fitzpatrick; Samantha Hauser; Philip W Hedrick; Joshua M Miller; David A Tallmon; W Chris Funk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genomic consequences of a century of inbreeding and isolation in the Danish wild boar population.

Authors:  Beril Yıldız; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Christina Hvilsom; Mirte Bosse
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Dynamics of reduced genetic diversity in increasingly fragmented populations of Florida scrub jays,Aphelocoma coerulescens.

Authors:  Tram N Nguyen; Nancy Chen; Elissa J Cosgrove; Reed Bowman; John W Fitzpatrick; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 7.  Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertorelle; Francesca Raffini; Hernán E Morales; Cock van Oosterhout; Mirte Bosse; Chiara Bortoluzzi; Alessio Iannucci; Emiliano Trucchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 59.581

8.  Genetic architecture and lifetime dynamics of inbreeding depression in a wild mammal.

Authors:  M A Stoffel; S E Johnston; J G Pilkington; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Genomic signatures of extensive inbreeding in Isle Royale wolves, a population on the threshold of extinction.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Robinson; Jannikke Räikkönen; Leah M Vucetich; John A Vucetich; Rolf O Peterson; Kirk E Lohmueller; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  The genome of the Pyrenean desman and the effects of bottlenecks and inbreeding on the genomic landscape of an endangered species.

Authors:  Lídia Escoda; Jose Castresana
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.