Literature DB >> 12884199

Dual-echo, chemical shift gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging to quantify hepatic steatosis: Implications for living liver donation.

Mary E Rinella1, Richard McCarthy, Kiran Thakrar, John Paul Finn, Sambasiva M Rao, Alan J Koffron, Michael Abecassis, Andres T Blei.   

Abstract

In living liver donation, a fatty liver poses risks for both recipient and donor. Currently, liver biopsy is the standard for assessing the presence and extent of steatosis. The goals of this study were to correlate a steatosis index derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the histologic grade on biopsy as well as to determine the topographic distribution of steatosis within the liver. We examined the ability of dual-echo, chemical shift gradient-echo MRI to predict the degree of steatosis on liver biopsy. A total of 22 subjects received both a liver biopsy and detailed MRI evaluation. These individuals included 15 potential living donors and 7 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. MRI steatosis index was then compared with histologic grade on liver biopsy. The topographic distribution of hepatic steatosis was determined from those subjects in whom MRI detected hepatic steatosis. The steatosis index had a positive correlation with grade of steatosis on liver biopsy (correlation coefficient, 0.84). There was no significant variation in the degree of steatosis among segments. A steatosis index of >0.2 had good positive and negative predictive value for the presence of significant steatosis (>15%) on biopsy. Our quantitative MRI protocol can predict the degree of hepatic steatosis when it is minimal to moderate, and may obviate the need for liver biopsy for the purpose of quantification of steatosis in living donors. Fat saturation added to the MRI protocol may further improve diagnostic accuracy. This technique may be applicable to the larger population with hepatic steatosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12884199     DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  24 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Simultaneous assessment of liver volume and whole liver fat content: a step towards one-stop shop preoperative MRI protocol.

Authors:  Gaspard d'Assignies; Claude Kauffmann; Yvan Boulanger; Marc Bilodeau; Valérie Vilgrain; Gilles Soulez; An Tang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Proton density fat-fraction: a standardized MR-based biomarker of tissue fat concentration.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Houchun H Hu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Renal relevant radiology: renal functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Behzad Ebrahimi; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Shehab M Abd El-Kader; Eman M Salah El-Den Ashmawy
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-28

7.  [Techniques for quantification of liver fat in risk stratification of diabetics].

Authors:  J-P Kühn; M C Spoerl; C Mahlke; K Hegenscheid
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Liver fat volume fraction quantification with fat and water T1 and T 2* estimation and accounting for NMR multiple components in patients with chronic liver disease at 1.5 and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Benjamin Leporq; Hélène Ratiney; Frank Pilleul; Olivier Beuf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Non-invasive means of measuring hepatic fat content.

Authors:  Sanjeev-R Mehta; E-Louise Thomas; Jimmy-D Bell; Desmond-G Johnston; Simon-D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  The role of hepatic fat accumulation in pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Authors:  Qing Liu; Stig Bengmark; Shen Qu
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.