BACKGROUND: Commercially available testosterone immunoassays give divergent results, especially at the low concentrations seen in women. We compared immunoassays and a nonimmunochemical method that could quantify low testosterone concentrations. METHODS: We measured serum testosterone in 50 men, 55 women, and 11 children with use of eight nonisotopic immunoassays, two isotopic immunoassays, and isotope-dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (ID/GC-MS). RESULTS: Compared with ID/GC-MS, 7 of the 10 immunoassays tested overestimated testosterone concentrations in samples from women; mean immunoassay results were 46% above those obtained by ID/GC-MS. The immunoassays underestimated testosterone concentrations in samples from men, giving mean results 12% below those obtained by ID/GC-MS. In women, at concentrations of 0.6-7.2 nmol/L, 3 of the 10 immunoassays gave positive mean differences >2.0 nmol/L (range, -0.7 to 3.3 nmol/L) compared with ID/GC-MS; in men at concentrations of 8.2-58 nmol/L, 3 of the 10 immunoassays tested gave mean differences >4.0 nmol/L (range, -4.8 to 2.6 nmol/L). CONCLUSION: None of the immunoassays tested was sufficiently reliable for the investigation of sera from children and women, in whom very low (0.17 nmol/L) and low (<1.7 nmol/L) testosterone concentrations are expected.
BACKGROUND: Commercially available testosterone immunoassays give divergent results, especially at the low concentrations seen in women. We compared immunoassays and a nonimmunochemical method that could quantify low testosterone concentrations. METHODS: We measured serum testosterone in 50 men, 55 women, and 11 children with use of eight nonisotopic immunoassays, two isotopic immunoassays, and isotope-dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (ID/GC-MS). RESULTS: Compared with ID/GC-MS, 7 of the 10 immunoassays tested overestimated testosterone concentrations in samples from women; mean immunoassay results were 46% above those obtained by ID/GC-MS. The immunoassays underestimated testosterone concentrations in samples from men, giving mean results 12% below those obtained by ID/GC-MS. In women, at concentrations of 0.6-7.2 nmol/L, 3 of the 10 immunoassays gave positive mean differences >2.0 nmol/L (range, -0.7 to 3.3 nmol/L) compared with ID/GC-MS; in men at concentrations of 8.2-58 nmol/L, 3 of the 10 immunoassays tested gave mean differences >4.0 nmol/L (range, -4.8 to 2.6 nmol/L). CONCLUSION: None of the immunoassays tested was sufficiently reliable for the investigation of sera from children and women, in whom very low (0.17 nmol/L) and low (<1.7 nmol/L) testosterone concentrations are expected.
Authors: Micol S Rothman; Nichole E Carlson; Mei Xu; Christina Wang; Ronald Swerdloff; Paul Lee; Victor H H Goh; E Chester Ridgway; Margaret E Wierman Journal: Steroids Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: A Radicioni; A Lenzi; M Spaziani; A Anzuini; G Ruga; G Papi; M Raimondo; C Foresta Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Christopher R McCartney; Christine M Burt Solorzano; James T Patrie; John C Marshall; Daniel J Haisenleder Journal: Steroids Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Margaret A Gates; Andre B Araujo; Susan A Hall; Gary A Wittert; John B McKinlay Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Johannes D Veldhuis; Olga P Bondar; Roy B Dyer; Sergey A Trushin; Eric W Klee; Ravinder J Singh; George G Klee Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Laura R Stroud; Catherine Solomon; Edmond Shenassa; George Papandonatos; Raymond Niaura; Lewis P Lipsitt; Kaja Lewinn; Stephen L Buka Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 4.905