Literature DB >> 10945392

Comparison of a specialist retrieval team with current United Kingdom practice for the transport of critically ill patients.

G Bellingan1, T Olivier, S Batson, A Webb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The inter-hospital transfer of critically ill patients in the United Kingdom is commonly undertaken using standard ambulance under junior doctor escort, despite recommendations for the use of specialist retrieval teams. Patients are transferred into University College London Hospitals (UCLH) intensive care unit (ICU) by both methods. We undertook to evaluate the effect of transfer method on acute physiology (within 2 h of ICU admission) and early mortality ( < 12 h after ICU admission).
DESIGN: Retrospective review of all transfers over 1 year.
SETTING: UCLH ICU.
SUBJECTS: 259 transfers; 168 by specialist retrieval team (group A) and 91 by standard ambulance with doctor provided by referring hospital (group B).
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute physiology (pH, PaO2, PaCO2, heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), 24 h severity of illness scores (APACHE II, SAPS II), length of stay and mortality.
RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic characteristics or severity of illness between the two groups; nevertheless significantly more patients in group B than in group A were severely acidotic (pH < 7.1: 11% vs. 3%, p < 0.008) and hypotensive (MAP < 60: 18 % vs. 9%, p < 0.03) upon arrival. In addition, there were more deaths within the first 12 h after admission with 7.7 % deaths (7/91) in group B transfers vs. 3% (5/168) in group A.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a specialist transfer team may significantly improve the acute physiology of critically ill patients and may reduce early mortality in ICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10945392     DOI: 10.1007/s001340051241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  34 in total

Review 1.  The pulmonary physician in critical care: towards comprehensive critical care?

Authors:  M J D Griffiths; T W Evans
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Problems in interhospital pediatric intensive care transport in The Netherlands: results from a survey of general pediatricians.

Authors:  G D Vos; F H M Nieman; A M B Meurs; D A Van Waardenburg; G Ramsay; R A M G Donckerwolcke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Critical care in the emergency department: patient transfer.

Authors:  M J G Dunn; C L Gwinnutt; A J Gray
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Arterial blood pressure changes induced by acceleration during mobile intensive care unit patient transport are not patient related: beware of misinterpretation.

Authors:  Joep M Droogh; Laurens Reinke; Gert Jan Snel; Brian Mouthaan; Michel M R F Struys; Jack J M Ligtenberg; Frederik Keus; Jan G Zijlstra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Transport of critically ill children: how to utilize resources in the developing world.

Authors:  Praveen Khilnani; Rajiv Chhabra
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2008-08-31       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 6.  [Interhospital transport of patients with ARDS].

Authors:  N Jahn; M T Voelker; S Bercker; U Kaisers; S Laudi
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  The effect of transfer and hospital volume in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Authors:  Miriam Nuño; Chirag G Patil; Patrick Lyden; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Benoît Fanara; Cyril Manzon; Olivier Barbot; Thibaut Desmettre; Gilles Capellier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Secondary transport of the critically ill and injured adult.

Authors:  A Gray; S Bush; S Whiteley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Evaluation of a risk score for interhospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Markakis; M Dalezios; C Chatzicostas; A Chalkiadaki; K Politi; P J Agouridakis
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.