OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effects of levels and duration of exposure to televised antismoking advertising on cognitive and behavioral changes. METHODS: We used data from a serial cross-sectional telephone survey with weekly interviews of adult smokers and recent quitters in New South Wales, Australia (n = 13,301), between April 2005 and December 2010. We merged survey data with commercial TV ratings data to estimate individuals' exposure to antismoking advertising. RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses indicated that after adjustment for a wide range of potential confounders, exposure to antismoking advertising at levels between 100 and 200 gross rating points per week on average over 6 to 9 weeks was associated with an increased likelihood of having (1) salient quitting thoughts and (2) recent quit attempts. Associations between exposure for shorter periods and these outcomes were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Broadcasting schedules may affect the success of antismoking ads. Campaign planners should ensure advertising exposure at adequate frequency over relatively sustained periods to maximize impact.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effects of levels and duration of exposure to televised antismoking advertising on cognitive and behavioral changes. METHODS: We used data from a serial cross-sectional telephone survey with weekly interviews of adult smokers and recent quitters in New South Wales, Australia (n = 13,301), between April 2005 and December 2010. We merged survey data with commercial TV ratings data to estimate individuals' exposure to antismoking advertising. RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses indicated that after adjustment for a wide range of potential confounders, exposure to antismoking advertising at levels between 100 and 200 gross rating points per week on average over 6 to 9 weeks was associated with an increased likelihood of having (1) salient quitting thoughts and (2) recent quit attempts. Associations between exposure for shorter periods and these outcomes were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Broadcasting schedules may affect the success of antismoking ads. Campaign planners should ensure advertising exposure at adequate frequency over relatively sustained periods to maximize impact.
Authors: D P Hopkins; P A Briss; C J Ricard; C G Husten; V G Carande-Kulis; J E Fielding; M O Alao; J W McKenna; D J Sharp; J R Harris; T A Woollery; K W Harris Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: M E Thompson; G T Fong; D Hammond; C Boudreau; P Driezen; A Hyland; R Borland; K M Cummings; G B Hastings; M Siahpush; A M Mackintosh; F L Laux Journal: Tob Control Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Matthew C Farrelly; Kevin C Davis; James M Nonnemaker; Kian Kamyab; Christine Jackson Journal: Tob Control Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Eric C Leas; Mark G Myers; David R Strong; C Richard Hofstetter; Wael K Al-Delaimy Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Li-Ling Huang; James F Thrasher; Erika Nayeli Abad; K Michael Cummings; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Abraham Brown; Gera E Nagelhout Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2015-01-14
Authors: L Springvloet; M C Willemsen; U Mons; B van den Putte; A E Kunst; R Guignard; K Hummel; S Allwright; M Siahpush; H de Vries; G E Nagelhout Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2015-08-31