Literature DB >> 25954434

Comparing the value of mammographic features and genetic variants in breast cancer risk prediction.

Yirong Wu1, Jie Liu1, David Page1, Peggy Peissig2, Catherine McCarty3, Adedayo A Onitilo4, Elizabeth S Burnside1.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare the value of mammographic features and genetic variants for breast cancer risk prediction with Bayesian reasoning and information theory. We conducted a retrospective case-control study, collecting mammographic findings and high-frequency/low-penetrance genetic variants from an existing personalized medicine data repository. We trained and tested Bayesian networks for mammographic findings and genetic variants respectively. We found that mammographic findings had a higher discriminative ability than genetic variants for improving breast cancer risk prediction in terms of the area under the ROC curve. We compared the value of each mammographic feature and genetic variant for breast risk prediction in terms of mutual information, with and without consideration of interactions of those risk factors. We also identified the interactions between mammographic features and genetic variants in an attempt to prioritize mammographic features and genetic variants to efficiently predict the risk of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25954434      PMCID: PMC4419896     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  24 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A tiny step closer to personalized risk prediction for breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Devilee; Matti A Rookus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Patricia Hartge; Ross Prentice; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Heather Spencer Feigelson; W Ryan Diver; Michael J Thun; David G Cox; Susan E Hankinson; Peter Kraft; Bernard Rosner; Christine D Berg; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Mark E Sherman; Rowan Chlebowski; Charles Kooperberg; Rebecca D Jackson; Dennis W Buckman; Peter Hui; Ruth Pfeiffer; Kevin B Jacobs; Gilles D Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Mitchell H Gail; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning.

Authors:  R Battiti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1994

5.  Information Extraction for Clinical Data Mining: A Mammography Case Study.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth Burnside; Mehmet Ayvaci; Jude Shavlik; David Page
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Data Min       Date:  2009

6.  Risk-association of five SNPs in TOX3/LOC643714 with breast cancer in southern China.

Authors:  Xuanqiu He; Guangyu Yao; Fenxia Li; Ming Li; Xuexi Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  New genetic variants improve personalized breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jie Liu; David Page; Peggy Peissig; Catherine McCarty; Adedayo A Onitilo; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2014-04-07

8.  Methodological issues in detecting gene-gene interactions in breast cancer susceptibility: a population-based study in Ontario.

Authors:  Laurent Briollais; Yuanyuan Wang; Isaac Rajendram; Venus Onay; Ellen Shi; Julia Knight; Hilmi Ozcelik
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Association between 5p12 genomic markers and breast cancer susceptibility: evidence from 19 case-control studies.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Wang; Liang Zhang; Zixian Chen; Yushui Ma; Yuan Zhao; Abudouaini Rewuti; Feng Zhang; Da Fu; Yusong Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Using information interaction to discover epistatic effects in complex diseases.

Authors:  Orlando Anunciação; Susana Vinga; Arlindo L Oliveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Developing a utility decision framework to evaluate predictive models in breast cancer risk estimation.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Craig K Abbey; Xianqiao Chen; Jie Liu; David C Page; Oguzhan Alagoz; Peggy Peissig; Adedayo A Onitilo; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-08-17

2.  Discriminatory power of common genetic variants in personalized breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Craig K Abbey; Jie Liu; Irene Ong; Peggy Peissig; Adedayo A Onitilo; Jun Fan; Ming Yuan; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-24

3.  Structure-Leveraged Methods in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Jun Fan; Yirong Wu; Ming Yuan; David Page; Jie Liu; Irene M Ong; Peggy Peissig; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.654

4.  Developing a clinical utility framework to evaluate prediction models in radiogenomics.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Jie Liu; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; David C Page; Oguzhan Alagoz; Peggy Peissig; Adedayo A Onitilo; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.