Literature DB >> 12872878

Exploring the role of repetition and sensory elaboration in the imagination inflation effect.

Ayanna K Thomas1, John B Bulevich, Elizabeth F Loftus.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine whether a misattribution of specific characteristics or a misattribution of global familiarity underlies false memories as assessed through imagination inflation. Using the paradigm developed by Goff and Roediger (1998), we found that the proportion of false memories increased with repeated imagination, replicating the imagination inflation effect. False memories developed through imagination were greatest in conditions that forced participants to include sensory detail in their imaginings. Finally, conscious recollection more often accompanied false memories in perceptually detailed imagination conditions, whereas feelings of familiarity more often accompanied false memories in conditions that lacked sensory cues. These results suggest that imagination that contains more perceptual information leads to more elaborate memory representations containing specific characteristics that can be confused with actually performed actions. Confusion based on these representations, as opposed to confusion based on processing fluency, is more likely to lead to false memories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12872878     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  Individual differences in imagination inflation.

Authors:  C Heaps; M Nash
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred.

Authors:  M Garry; C G Manning; E F Loftus; S J Sherman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06

3.  Imagination inflation for action events: repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections.

Authors:  L M Goff; H L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

4.  Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects?

Authors:  R L Moreland; R B Zajonc
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1977-04

5.  In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead. Long live the sleeper effect.

Authors:  A R Pratkanis; A G Greenwald; M R Leippe; M H Baumgardner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-02

6.  Functional aspects of recollective experience.

Authors:  J M Gardiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

7.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.

Authors:  M K Johnson; M A Foley; A G Suengas; C L Raye
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

8.  Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.

Authors:  S Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

9.  Imagery ability and source monitoring: implications for eyewitness memory.

Authors:  M Dobson; R Markham
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1993-02

Review 10.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  16 in total

1.  Do you remember proposing marriage to the Pepsi machine? False recollections from a campus walk.

Authors:  John G Seamon; Morgan M Philbin; Liza G Harrison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

2.  Is knowing believing? The role of event plausibility and background knowledge in planting false beliefs about the personal past.

Authors:  Kathy Pezdek; Iris Blandon-Gitlin; Shirley Lam; Rhiannon Ellis Hart; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

3.  Digitally manipulating memory: effects of doctored videos and imagination in distorting beliefs and memories.

Authors:  Robert A Nash; Kimberley A Wade; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

4.  Age-related deficits in reality monitoring of action memories.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Keith B Lyle; Karin M Butler; Courtney C Dornburg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-09

5.  Separating past and future autobiographical events in memory: evidence for a reality monitoring asymmetry.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

6.  Autobiographical memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Evidence for a role of inhibitory ability.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Lynette Tippett; Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-12

7.  Nonprobative photos rapidly lead people to believe claims about their own (and other people's) pasts.

Authors:  Brittany A Cardwell; Linda A Henkel; Maryanne Garry; Eryn J Newman; Jeffrey L Foster
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

8.  The imagination inflation effect in healthy older adults and patients with mild Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Maureen K O'Connor; Rebecca G Deason; Erin Reynolds; Michael J Tat; Sean Flannery; Paul R Solomon; Elizabeth A Vassey; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Confusing what you heard with what you did: False action-memories from auditory cues.

Authors:  Isabel Lindner; Linda A Henkel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

10.  No imagination effect on boundary extension.

Authors:  Margaret P Munger; Kristi S Multhaup
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.