Literature DB >> 26250804

No imagination effect on boundary extension.

Margaret P Munger1, Kristi S Multhaup2.   

Abstract

Boundary extension (BE) occurs when people falsely remember perceiving beyond the edges of a presented scene. Theorists argue that BE occurs because people mistakenly attribute information they have generated to the study stimulus-that is, they make a source memory error. Inspired by this idea, in six experiments we tested whether scene details resulting from explicit imagination would be misremembered as actual visual perceptions, resulting in increased BE as compared with standard instructions. In four experiments, undergraduates completed a BE task with separate study and test blocks; in two further experiments, undergraduates completed a trial-by-trial BE task (N = 290). Half of the participants elaborated on the study pictures (imagined smells and sounds, or what was to the left and right of the scene, or what a photographer would see by zooming in or out). Robust BE was found in all experiments, but none of the elaborations modified the size of BE; therefore, BE is not to be affected by explicit elaboration and may be related to spatial rather than visual imagery ability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boundary extension; Source memory; Spatial imagery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26250804     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0541-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

Review 1.  Boundary extension: findings and theories.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard; Joanna L Hutchison; Jon R Courtney
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Imagery encoding and false recognition errors: Examining the role of imagery process and imagery content on source misattributions.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Jeffrey Foy; Emily Schlemmer; Janna Belser-Ehrlich
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-10-04

3.  Rethinking visual scene perception.

Authors:  Helene Intraub
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-05-06

4.  Transsaccadic representation of layout: what is the time course of boundary extension?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures.

Authors:  H Intraub; C V Gottesman; A J Bills
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  A bias to detail: how hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory.

Authors:  Christopher C Davoli; James R Brockmole; Annabelle Goujon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

8.  Aging, source, and decision criteria: when false fame errors do and do not occur.

Authors:  K S Multhaup
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-09

9.  The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-04

10.  Seeking the boundary of boundary extension.

Authors:  Benjamin A McDunn; Aisha P Siddiqui; James M Brown
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  The role of arousal in boundary judgement errors.

Authors:  Deanne M Green; Jessica A Wilcock; Melanie K T Takarangi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

2.  Boundary Extension in Face Processing.

Authors:  Olesya Blazhenkova
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-09-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.