Literature DB >> 8467368

Imagery ability and source monitoring: implications for eyewitness memory.

M Dobson1, R Markham.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of self-reported vividness of visual imagery on the ability to discriminate between memories derived from two external sources of information. Subjects were shown a film of a crime and were then given a written description of the event which included information not seen in the film. In a source monitoring task, high and low imagers were found to be equally proficient in recognizing items as previously presented, but high imagers were poorer at discriminating the source of items based on the written description. This finding is considered in terms of possible encoding and retrieval differences resulting from imagery vividness. The role of vivid visual imagery as a variable underpinning confusions in eyewitness testimony is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8467368     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1993.tb02466.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  14 in total

1.  Individual differences in imagination inflation.

Authors:  C Heaps; M Nash
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  Exploring the role of repetition and sensory elaboration in the imagination inflation effect.

Authors:  Ayanna K Thomas; John B Bulevich; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

3.  Habitual acceptance of misinformation: examination of individual differences and source attributions.

Authors:  David R Cann; Albert N Katz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

4.  Actually, a picture is worth less than 45 words: narratives produce more false memories than photographs do.

Authors:  Maryanne Garry; Kimberley A Wade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

5.  Vividness of mental imagery: individual variability can be measured objectively.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Cameron B Jeter; Dongni Yang; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Source confusion influences the effectiveness of the autobiographical IAT.

Authors:  Melanie K T Takarangi; Deryn Strange; Alexandra E Shortland; Hannah E James
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

7.  Brain mechanisms underlying reality monitoring for heard and imagined words.

Authors:  Eriko Sugimori; Karen J Mitchell; Carol L Raye; Erich J Greene; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-01-17

8.  The imagination inflation effect in healthy older adults and patients with mild Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Maureen K O'Connor; Rebecca G Deason; Erin Reynolds; Michael J Tat; Sean Flannery; Paul R Solomon; Elizabeth A Vassey; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Source monitoring and memory distortion.

Authors:  M K Johnson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  A little elaboration goes a long way: the role of generation in eyewitness suggestibility.

Authors:  Sean M Lane; Maria S Zaragoza
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.