Literature DB >> 12869696

Prediction of clinical drug efficacy by classification of drug-induced genomic expression profiles in vitro.

Erik C Gunther1, David J Stone, Robert W Gerwien, Patricia Bento, Melvyn P Heyes.   

Abstract

Assays of drug action typically evaluate biochemical activity. However, accurately matching therapeutic efficacy with biochemical activity is a challenge. High-content cellular assays seek to bridge this gap by capturing broad information about the cellular physiology of drug action. Here, we present a method of predicting the general therapeutic classes into which various psychoactive drugs fall, based on high-content statistical categorization of gene expression profiles induced by these drugs. When we used the classification tree and random forest supervised classification algorithms to analyze microarray data, we derived general "efficacy profiles" of biomarker gene expression that correlate with anti-depressant, antipsychotic and opioid drug action on primary human neurons in vitro. These profiles were used as predictive models to classify naïve in vitro drug treatments with 83.3% (random forest) and 88.9% (classification tree) accuracy. Thus, the detailed information contained in genomic expression data is sufficient to match the physiological effect of a novel drug at the cellular level with its clinical relevance. This capacity to identify therapeutic efficacy on the basis of gene expression signatures in vitro has potential utility in drug discovery and drug target validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12869696      PMCID: PMC170965          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1632587100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  Microarray analysis of hepatotoxins in vitro reveals a correlation between gene expression profiles and mechanisms of toxicity.

Authors:  J F Waring; R Ciurlionis; R A Jolly; M Heindel; R G Ulrich
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2001-03-31       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Gene expression analysis reveals chemical-specific profiles.

Authors:  Hisham K Hamadeh; Pierre R Bushel; Supriya Jayadev; Karla Martin; Olimpia DiSorbo; Stella Sieber; Lee Bennett; Raymond Tennant; Raymond Stoll; J Carl Barrett; Kerry Blanchard; Richard S Paules; Cynthia A Afshari
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Discriminant analysis to evaluate clustering of gene expression data.

Authors:  Marco A Méndez; Christian Hödar; Chris Vulpe; Mauricio González; Verónica Cambiazo
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 4.  The promise of toxicogenomics.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Waring; Donald N Halbert
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2002-06

Review 5.  Application of toxicogenomics to drug development.

Authors:  Maha M Lakkis; Marc F DeCristofaro; Hans J Ahr; Traci A Mansfield
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Mapping physiological states from microarray expression measurements.

Authors:  Gregory Stephanopoulos; Daehee Hwang; William A Schmitt; Jatin Misra; George Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression.

Authors:  Scott L Pomeroy; Pablo Tamayo; Michelle Gaasenbeek; Lisa M Sturla; Michael Angelo; Margaret E McLaughlin; John Y H Kim; Liliana C Goumnerova; Peter M Black; Ching Lau; Jeffrey C Allen; David Zagzag; James M Olson; Tom Curran; Cynthia Wetmore; Jaclyn A Biegel; Tomaso Poggio; Shayan Mukherjee; Ryan Rifkin; Andrea Califano; Gustavo Stolovitzky; David N Louis; Jill P Mesirov; Eric S Lander; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes.

Authors:  A P Gasch; P T Spellman; C M Kao; O Carmel-Harel; M B Eisen; G Storz; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Prediction of compound signature using high density gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Hisham K Hamadeh; Pierre R Bushel; Supriya Jayadev; Olimpia DiSorbo; Lee Bennett; Leping Li; Raymond Tennant; Raymond Stoll; J Carl Barrett; Richard S Paules; Kerry Blanchard; Cynthia A Afshari
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Artificial neural networks and gene filtering distinguish between global gene expression profiles of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Florin M Selaru; Jing Yin; Tong Tong Zou; Valentina Shustova; Yuriko Mori; Fumiaki Sato; Thomas C Liu; Andreea Olaru; Suna Wang; Martha C Kimos; Kellie Perry; Kena Desai; Bruce D Greenwald; Mark J Krasna; David Shibata; John M Abraham; Stephen J Meltzer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  44 in total

1.  Multiplex mRNA assay using electrophoretic tags for high-throughput gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Huan Tian; Liching Cao; Yuping Tan; Stephen Williams; Lili Chen; Tracy Matray; Ahmed Chenna; Sean Moore; Vincent Hernandez; Vivian Xiao; Mengxiang Tang; Sharat Singh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Discovering the mechanism of action of novel antibacterial agents through transcriptional profiling of conditional mutants.

Authors:  C Freiberg; H P Fischer; N A Brunner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Classification of a large microarray data set: algorithm comparison and analysis of drug signatures.

Authors:  Georges Natsoulis; Laurent El Ghaoui; Gert R G Lanckriet; Alexander M Tolley; Fabrice Leroy; Shane Dunlea; Barrett P Eynon; Cecelia I Pearson; Stuart Tugendreich; Kurt Jarnagin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  VeloceGenomics: an accelerated in vivo drug discovery approach to rapidly predict the biologic, drug-like activity of compounds, proteins, or genes.

Authors:  Ruben Papoian; Andreas Scherer; Muriel Saulnier; Frank Staedtler; André Cordier; Francois Legay; Gerard Maurer; Joerg Staeheli; Jacky Vonderscher; Salah-Dine Chibout
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Integrated mechanistic and data-driven modelling for multivariate analysis of signalling pathways.

Authors:  Fei Hua; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Rayka Yokoo; Douglas A Lauffenburger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Is bagging effective in the classification of small-sample genomic and proteomic data?

Authors:  T T Vu; U M Braga-Neto
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2009-04-16

7.  Gene expression profiling and its practice in drug development.

Authors:  Murty V Chengalvala; Vargheese M Chennathukuzhi; Daniel S Johnston; Panayiotis E Stevis; Gregory S Kopf
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.236

8.  Drug discovery in psychiatric illness: mining for gold.

Authors:  Greg I Elmer; Neri Kafkafi
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; James Malley; Gerhard Tutz
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-12

10.  Differential distribution improves gene selection stability and has competitive classification performance for patient survival.

Authors:  Dario Strbenac; Graham J Mann; Jean Y H Yang; John T Ormerod
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.