Literature DB >> 12067993

Artificial neural networks and gene filtering distinguish between global gene expression profiles of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer.

Yan Xu1, Florin M Selaru, Jing Yin, Tong Tong Zou, Valentina Shustova, Yuriko Mori, Fumiaki Sato, Thomas C Liu, Andreea Olaru, Suna Wang, Martha C Kimos, Kellie Perry, Kena Desai, Bruce D Greenwald, Mark J Krasna, David Shibata, John M Abraham, Stephen J Meltzer.   

Abstract

cDNAmicroarrays, combined with bioinformatics analyses, are becomingincreasingly used in current medical research. Existing analytic methods,particularly those that are unsupervised, often have difficulty recognizing subtle differences among predefined subgroups. In contrast, supervised methods, such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), are able to recognize subtly different biological entities. We applied ANNs in a proof-of-principle study of cDNA microarray data in esophageal cancer (CA) and premalignancy. cDNA microarrays, each containing 8064 clones, were hybridized to RNAs from 22 esophageal lesions, including 14 Barrett's esophagus (BA) metaplasias and 8 esophageal carcinomas (3 squamous cell carcinomas and 5 adenocarcinomas). Scanned cDNA microarray data were analyzed using the bioinformatics software Cluster/TreeView, Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM), and ANNs. Cluster analysis based on all 8064 clones on the microarrays was unable to correctly distinguish BA specimens from CA specimens. SAM then selected 160 differentially expressed genes between Barrett's and cancer. Cluster analysis based on this reduced set still misclassified 2 Barrett's as cancers. The ANN was trained on 12 samples and tested against the remaining 10 samples. Using the 160 selected genes, the ANN correctly diagnosed all 10 samples in the test set. Finally, the 160 genes selected by SAM may merit further study as biomarkers of neoplastic progression in the esophagus, as well as in elucidating pathological mechanisms underlying BA and CA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12067993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  30 in total

1.  Difference of gene expression profiles between esophageal carcinoma and its pericancerous epithelium by gene chip.

Authors:  Shen-Hua Xu; Li-Juan Qian; Han-Zhou Mou; Chi-Hong Zhu; Xing-Ming Zhou; Xiang-Lin Liu; Yong Chen; Wen-Yu Bao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prediction of clinical drug efficacy by classification of drug-induced genomic expression profiles in vitro.

Authors:  Erik C Gunther; David J Stone; Robert W Gerwien; Patricia Bento; Melvyn P Heyes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rapid and dynamic alterations of gene expression profiles of adult porcine bone marrow-derived stem cell in response to hypoxia.

Authors:  Suna Wang; Yifu Zhou; Caleb N Seavey; Avneesh K Singh; Xiuli Xu; Timothy Hunt; Robert F Hoyt; Keith A Horvath
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.020

4.  Altered expression of TFF-1 and CES-2 in Barrett's Esophagus and associated adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Charles A Fox; Lisa M Sapinoso; Hong Zhang; Wanghai Zhang; Howard L McLeod; Gina R Petroni; Tarun Mullick; Christopher A Moskaluk; Henry F Frierson; Garret M Hampton; Steven M Powell
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 5.  cDNA microarray analysis of esophageal cancer: discoveries and prospects.

Authors:  Yutaka Shimada; Fumiaki Sato; Kazuharu Shimizu; Gozoh Tsujimoto; Kazuhiro Tsukada
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-14

6.  Expression analysis of Barrett's esophagus-associated high-grade dysplasia in laser capture microdissected archival tissue.

Authors:  Edmond Sabo; Patricia A Meitner; Rosemarie Tavares; Christopher L Corless; Gregory Y Lauwers; Steven F Moss; Murray B Resnick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Gene expression in Barrett's esophagus: laser capture versus whole tissue.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; Zhannat Z Nurgalieva; Toni-Ann Mistretta; Milton J Finegold; Rhonda Souza; Susan Hilsenbeck; Chad Shaw; Gretchen Darlington
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Identification of novel cellular targets in biliary tract cancers using global gene expression technology.

Authors:  Donna E Hansel; Ayman Rahman; Manuel Hidalgo; Paul J Thuluvath; Keith D Lillemoe; Richard Schulick; Ja-Lok Ku; Jae-Gahb Park; Kohje Miyazaki; Raheela Ashfaq; Ignacio I Wistuba; Ram Varma; Lesleyann Hawthorne; Joseph Geradts; Pedram Argani; Anirban Maitra
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  The use of artificial neural networks in prediction of congenital CMV outcome from sequence data.

Authors:  Ravit Arav-Boger; Yuval S Boger; Charles B Foster; Zvi Boger
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-05-29

10.  p63 and p73 transcriptionally regulate genes involved in DNA repair.

Authors:  Yu-Li Lin; Shomit Sengupta; Katherine Gurdziel; George W Bell; Tyler Jacks; Elsa R Flores
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.