Literature DB >> 12868698

The prognostic value of FISH as an adjunct to conventional cytogenetics for the detection of cryptic gene rearrangements on chromosome 16. A retrospective investigation of 13 patients from Northern Ireland diagnosed with M4Eo acute myeloid leukaemia.

P McGrattan1, M W Humphreys.   

Abstract

M4Eo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients with the typical chromosome 16 abnormalities have a favourable prognosis. These subtle 16q22 gene rearrangements can be difficult to detect by conventional cytogenetic methods and if missed could lead to the incorrect assignment of prognostic group and hence subsequent treatment strategies. We retrospectively studied 13 patients diagnosed with M4Eo AML for such chromosome 16 abnormalities comparing conventional cytogenetic (G-banding) and molecular (FISH) methods. G-banded analysis detected only 2 patients with definite chromosome 16 abnormalities whereas FISH detected 4 patients, one with the typical inversion and three with the typical chromosome 16 translocation. FISH analysis also confirmed a false +ve G-banded result in one patient and a false -ve G-banded result in another patient. Finally, FISH confirmed a deletion of one chromosome 16 homologue in another patient indicating a poor prognosis. The overall survival of patients with the typical 16q22 rearrangements (n=4) was also significantly better (P=0.007) than patients with normal chromosome 16 homologues or having other numerical and/or structural abnormalities (n=9). This set of data shows that FISH is a more accurate method for the detection of cryptic 16q22 gene rearrangements and because of the prognostic implications has become a mandatory test along with conventional cytogenetics for all newly diagnosed M4Eo AML patients in Northern Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12868698      PMCID: PMC2475396     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulster Med J        ISSN: 0041-6193


  10 in total

1.  Underestimation of inversion (16) in acute myeloid leukaemia using standard cytogenetics as compared with polymerase chain reaction: results of a prospective investigation.

Authors:  M Ritter; C Thiede; U Schäkel; M Schmidt; B Alpen; U Pascheberg; B Mohr; G Ehninger; A Neubauer
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 2.  Cytogenetics and oncogenes in leukemia.

Authors:  M R Baer; C D Bloomfield
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.645

3.  Prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with de novo acute nonlymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  C A Schiffer; E J Lee; T Tomiyasu; P H Wiernik; J R Testa
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Prognostic significance of karyotype in de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia. The BGMT group.

Authors:  N Dastugue; C Payen; M Lafage-Pochitaloff; P Bernard; D Leroux; F Huguet-Rigal; A M Stoppa; G Marit; L Molina; M Michallet
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Cytogenetic and clinical correlates in AML patients with abnormalities of chromosome 16.

Authors:  P Marlton; M Keating; H Kantarjian; S Pierce; S O'Brien; E J Freireich; E Estey
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Association of an inversion of chromosome 16 with abnormal marrow eosinophils in acute myelomonocytic leukemia. A unique cytogenetic-clinicopathological association.

Authors:  M M Le Beau; R A Larson; M A Bitter; J W Vardiman; H M Golomb; J D Rowley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Abnormalities of chromosome 16q in myeloid malignancy: 14 new cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  D R Betts; A Z Rohatiner; M L Evans; S M Rassam; T A Lister; B Gibbons
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Chromosome change at 16q22 in nonlymphocytic leukemia: clinical implication on leukemia patients with inv(16) versus del(16).

Authors:  K Ohyashiki; J H Ohyashiki; M Kondo; H Ito; K Toyama
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Acute myelomonocytic leukemia with abnormal eosinophils and inv(16) or t(16;16) has a favorable prognosis.

Authors:  R A Larson; S F Williams; M M Le Beau; M A Bitter; J W Vardiman; J D Rowley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Is trisomy 22 in acute myeloid leukemia a primary abnormality or only a secondary change associated with inversion 16?

Authors:  N Grois; H Nowotny; E Tyl; O Krieger; P Kier; O A Haas
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1989-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.