Literature DB >> 7658718

Prognostic significance of karyotype in de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia. The BGMT group.

N Dastugue1, C Payen, M Lafage-Pochitaloff, P Bernard, D Leroux, F Huguet-Rigal, A M Stoppa, G Marit, L Molina, M Michallet.   

Abstract

A group of 201 adult patients, 127 younger and 74 older than 55 years, with de novo acute myeloid leukemia were investigated to determine the prognostic significance of karyotype on early death (toxic or aplastic death occurring before hematopoietic recovery), drug resistance, continuous complete remission (CCR) and survival probabilities at 5 years. A good prognostic impact was found for t(8;21), t(15;17) and inv(16). The best factor proved to be t(8;21) (5-year survival probability: 50%), followed by t(15;17) (5-year survival probability: 39%) and by inv(16) (5-year survival probability: 43%). An intermediate outcome was found in patients with trisomy 8 (27% alive at 5 years) and in patients with numerical abnormalities other than -7 and +8 (33% in CCR and 62% alive at 5 years). Normal karyotypes had a different prognostic impact according to age: intermediate in young and good in older patients. A poor outcome was observed among patients with del(5q)/-5 (median survival: 1 month), with 11q23 rearrangements (median survival: 1.5 months) and with del(7q)/-7 (median survival: 10 months). The 'other structural change' group was also found to be a poor risk population (5-year survival probability: 5%) whereas complex karyotypes were predictive of short survivals only in older patients. Conversely, del(7q)/-7 and +8 as secondary changes, had no prognostic impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7658718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  14 in total

1.  The MYND motif is required for repression of basal transcription from the multidrug resistance 1 promoter by the t(8;21) fusion protein.

Authors:  B Lutterbach; D Sun; J Schuetz; S W Hiebert
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Fas, Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin 1beta-converting enzyme-like inhibitory protein, and apoptotic features of elderly acute myeloid leukemia based on response to induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hee-Je Kim; Byung-Hee Park; Young Choi; Woo-Sung Min; Jong-Wook Lee; Chun-Choo Kim
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Impact of cytogenetics on outcome of matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission.

Authors:  Martin S Tallman; Gordon W Dewald; Sharavi Gandham; Brent R Logan; Armand Keating; Hillard M Lazarus; Mark R Litzow; Jayesh Mehta; Tanya Pedersen; Waleska S Pérez; Jacob M Rowe; Meir Wetzler; Daniel J Weisdorf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Morphological diagnoses of the Japan adult leukemia study group acute myeloid leukemia protocols: central review.

Authors:  K Kuriyama; M Tomonaga; T Kobayashi; J Takeuchi; T Ohshima; S Furusawa; K Saitoh; R Ohno
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Population-based disparities in survival among patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Andrew M Brunner; Traci M Blonquist; Hossein Sadrzadeh; Ashley M Perry; Eyal C Attar; Philip C Amrein; Karen K Ballen; Yi-Bin Chen; Donna S Neuberg; Amir T Fathi
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  Persistence of cytogenetic abnormalities at complete remission after induction in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic significance and the potential role of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Yiming Chen; Jorge Cortes; Zeev Estrov; Stefan Faderl; Wei Qiao; Lynne Abruzzo; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Sherry Pierce; Xuelin Huang; Partow Kebriaei; Tapan Kadia; Marcos De Lima; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia: New Prognostic Categories and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Chandrima Sinha; Lea C Cunningham; Paul P Liu
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 8.  Cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Pretreatment cytogenetics add to other prognostic factors predicting complete remission and long-term outcome in patients 60 years of age or older with acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8461.

Authors:  Sherif S Farag; Kellie J Archer; Krzysztof Mrózek; Amy S Ruppert; Andrew J Carroll; James W Vardiman; Mark J Pettenati; Maria R Baer; Mazin B Qumsiyeh; Prasad R Koduru; Yi Ning; Robert J Mayer; Richard M Stone; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Intact expression status of RASSF1A in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Davood Zare-Abdollahi; Shamsi Safari; Abolfazl Movafagh; Mojtaba Ghadiani; Sahand Riazi-Isfahani; Mir Davood Omrani
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.