Literature DB >> 9326197

Underestimation of inversion (16) in acute myeloid leukaemia using standard cytogenetics as compared with polymerase chain reaction: results of a prospective investigation.

M Ritter1, C Thiede, U Schäkel, M Schmidt, B Alpen, U Pascheberg, B Mohr, G Ehninger, A Neubauer.   

Abstract

In order to determine whether the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is more suitable for the detection of inversion (16) as compared with standard cytogenetics, we prospectively investigated a total of 132 cases of de novo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) (n = 121) and secondary AML after myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (n = 11) using a sensitive and nested PCR procedure to detect the fusion transcripts CBFbeta-MYH11. All patients were recruited within 10 months in an ongoing multicentre AML-trial. In addition, several cases from a retrospective molecular analysis were included. The data were compared with standard cytogenetics performed in a central laboratory. Of the 132 prospective AML cases, five patients (3.7%) harboured inv(16) upon conventional cytogenetics. In all cases fusion transcripts CBFbeta-MYH11 were detected using PCR. In addition in two patients fusion transcripts were detected, although cytogenetics revealed a normal karyotype. In the group of patients analysed retrospectively, four patients harboured fusion transcripts specific for CBFbeta-MYH11; cytogenetics were normal in one case, and could not be evaluated in two cases. These data show that PCR may be a better means to detect inv(16) in AML. Since inv(16) may have prognostic impact in AML, detection of this aberration seems important in the clinical management of AML patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9326197     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.2933107.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  5 in total

1.  Comprehensive analysis of CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion transcripts in acute myeloid leukemia by RT-PCR analysis.

Authors:  ShriHari S Kadkol; Annette Bruno; Carol Dodge; Valerie Lindgren; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies cryptic t(16;16)(p13;q22) masked by del(16)(q22) in a case of AML-M4 Eo.

Authors:  Shakil H Merchant; Skip Haines; Bryan Hall; John Hozier; David S Viswanatha
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Oncogenic NRAS Primes Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells for Differentiation.

Authors:  Cornelia Brendel; Sabine Teichler; Axel Millahn; Thorsten Stiewe; Michael Krause; Kathleen Stabla; Petra Ross; Minh Huynh; Thomas Illmer; Marco Mernberger; Christina Barckhausen; Andreas Neubauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The prognostic value of FISH as an adjunct to conventional cytogenetics for the detection of cryptic gene rearrangements on chromosome 16. A retrospective investigation of 13 patients from Northern Ireland diagnosed with M4Eo acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  P McGrattan; M W Humphreys
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2003-05

5.  Incidental identification of inv(16)(p13.1q22)/CBFB-MYH11 variant transcript in a patient with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia by routine leukemia translocation panel screen: implications for diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Andrés E Quesada; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Elias Jabbour; Keyur P Patel; Joseph D Khoury; Zhenya Tang; Hector Alvarez; Saradhi Mallampati; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Guillermo Montalban-Bravo; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2021-06-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.