Literature DB >> 20711565

Competitive effects on steady-state visual evoked potentials with frequencies in- and outside the α band.

Christian Keitel1, Søren K Andersen, Matthias M Müller.   

Abstract

Multiple concurrently presented stimuli are thought to compete for neuronal processing resources. Such competitive stimulus interactions can be investigated by "frequency tagging" each stimulus with an individual temporal frequency. In this case, all stimuli will drive distinct steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), hence allowing for an assessment of the distribution of processing resources. Here, we investigated whether competitive effects on SSVEP amplitudes are dependent upon the choice of tagging frequency of either the driving stimulus or a close-by competing stimulus. In particular, we were interested whether changes in amplitude are specific to a 10-Hz SSVEP, as it has been suggested that tagging frequencies within the alpha band drive uniquely characterized neural networks. If this was the case, an additional competition might be introduced when two stimuli are tagged with frequencies within the alpha band and thus compete for processing resources in similar networks. Additionally, we tested whether effects on SSVEP amplitude differ when the competing stimulus is tagged with a frequency of 12 Hz that produces a perceptible flicker when compared to an imperceptible 60-Hz flicker. We found a significant decrease in amplitude of 10- and 15-Hz SSVEPs upon presentation of the competing stimulus regardless of its tagging frequency. Our results clearly indicate that an SSVEP with a frequency within the alpha band and a 15-Hz SSVEP show similar sensitivity to effects of competition. Furthermore, the observed effects of competition on SSVEP amplitude occur independently of flicker perceptibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20711565     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2384-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Steady-state visual evoked potentials and travelling waves.

Authors:  G R Burkitt; R B Silberstein; P J Cadusch; A W Wood
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Steady state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) topography in a graded working memory task.

Authors:  R B Silberstein; P L Nunez; A Pipingas; P Harris; F Danieli
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Sean M Polyn; Greg J Detre; James V Haxby
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.

Authors:  Peter Malinowski; Sandra Fuchs; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Time course of competition for visual processing resources between emotional pictures and foreground task.

Authors:  Matthias M Müller; Søren K Andersen; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Steady-state visually evoked potential topography during the Wisconsin card sorting test.

Authors:  R B Silberstein; J Ciorciari; A Pipingas
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.

Authors:  Søren K Andersen; Sandra Fuchs; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  9 in total

1.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Steady-state visual evoked potentials as a research tool in social affective neuroscience.

Authors:  Matthias J Wieser; Vladimir Miskovic; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Extent and time-course of competition in visual cortex between emotionally arousing distractors and a concurrent task.

Authors:  Menton M Deweese; Matthias Müller; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Selective attention to task-irrelevant emotional distractors is unaffected by the perceptual load associated with a foreground task.

Authors:  Catherine Hindi Attar; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multi-phase cycle coding for SSVEP based brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Jijun Tong; Danhua Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Neural Entrainment Meets Behavior: The Stability Index as a Neural Outcome Measure of Auditory-Motor Coupling.

Authors:  Mattia Rosso; Marc Leman; Lousin Moumdjian
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Enhancement and suppression in the visual field under perceptual load.

Authors:  Nathan A Parks; Diane M Beck; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23

8.  Face-evoked steady-state visual potentials: effects of presentation rate and face inversion.

Authors:  L Forest Gruss; Matthias J Wieser; Stefan R Schweinberger; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention.

Authors:  Stephen Whitmarsh; Christophe Gitton; Veikko Jousmäki; Jérôme Sackur; Catherine Tallon-Baudry
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.