Literature DB >> 15788521

Effect of interocular delay on disparity-selective v1 neurons: relationship to stereoacuity and the pulfrich effect.

Jenny C A Read1, Bruce G Cumming.   

Abstract

The temporal properties of disparity-sensitive neurons place important temporal constraints on stereo matching. We examined these constraints by measuring the responses of disparity-selective neurons in striate cortex of awake behaving monkeys to random-dot stereograms that contained interocular delays. Disparity selectivity was gradually abolished by increasing interocular delay (when the delay exceeds the integration time, the inputs from the 2 eyes become uncorrelated). The amplitude of the disparity-selective response was a Gaussian function of interocular delay, with a mean of 16 ms (+/-5 ms, SD). Psychophysical measures of stereoacuity, in both monkey and human observers, showed a closely similar dependency on time, suggesting that temporal integration in V1 neurons is what determines psychophysical matching constraints over time. There was a slight but consistent asymmetry in the neuronal responses, as if the optimum stimulus is one in which the right stimulus leads by about 4 ms. Because all recordings were made in the left hemisphere, this probably reflects nasotemporal differences in conduction times; psychophysical data are compatible with this interpretation. In only a few neurons (5/72), interocular delay caused a change in the preferred disparity. Such tilted disparity/delay profiles have been invoked previously to explain depth perception in the stroboscopic version of the Pulfrich effect (and other variants). However, the great majority of the neurons did not show tilted disparity/delay profiles. This suggests that either the activity of these neurons is ignored when viewing Pulfrich stimuli, or that current theories relating neuronal properties to perception in the Pulfrich effect need to be reevaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15788521      PMCID: PMC1414116          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01177.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  Broadband temporal stimuli decrease the integration time of neurons in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  R C Reid; J D Victor; R M Shapley
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Direction selectivity of cells in the cat's striate cortex: differences between bar and grating stimuli.

Authors:  C Casanova; J P Nordmann; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to area MT in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  J A Movshon; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Binocular disparity and the perception of depth.

Authors:  N Qian
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Stereopsis in dynamic visual noise.

Authors:  C W Tyler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-08-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Stereoscopic depth perception at high velocities.

Authors:  M J Morgan; E Castet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mechanisms for dynamic stereomotion respond selectively to horizontal velocity components.

Authors:  M J Morgan; C W Tyler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  M J Hawken; R M Shapley; D H Grosof
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  9 in total

1.  The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Terminator disparity contributes to stereo matching for eye movements and perception.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Pulfrich phenomena are coded effectively by a joint motion-disparity process.

Authors:  Ning Qian; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.

Authors:  David Kane; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  The Pulfrich effect in the clinic.

Authors:  Sijie Heng; Gordon N Dutton
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  On the inverse problem of binocular 3D motion perception.

Authors:  Martin Lages; Suzanne Heron
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Evidence for joint encoding of motion and disparity in human visual perception.

Authors:  Peter Neri; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Alternation frequency thresholds for stereopsis as a technique for exploring stereoscopic difficulties.

Authors:  Svetlana Rychkova; Jacques Ninio
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-03-30

9.  The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.

Authors:  C Vijay Reena Durai; Siddhart Rajendran; Michael A Webster; Sandeep Vempati; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.