Literature DB >> 12856238

The influence of neighbor relatedness on multilevel selection in the Great Lakes sea rocket.

Kathleen Donohue1.   

Abstract

Natural selection can operate at the individual and group level in natural populations. This study investigates the ecological factors that determine the relative importance of individual versus group selection. In particular, it determines how the relatedness of interacting neighbors influences multilevel natural selection in a population of the Great Lakes sea rocket. Focal plants were grown in groups of siblings, groups of plants that were themselves siblings but unrelated to the focal plants, and groups of plants with mixed genotypes. Significant group selection on plant size was observed only when the neighbors were siblings but not when they were unrelated. In sibling groups, individuals with heavier stems had higher fitness, and individuals growing with heavier but shorter neighbors also had higher fitness. Thus, individual and group selection on stem weight operated in the same direction. The detection of group selection in sibling groups can be attributed in part to an increased opportunity for group selection in these groups since sibling groups differed more from one another than the other group types. In addition, the quality of the selective environment in sibling groups may have differed from that for the other group types. Group selection was therefore more prevalent in the most genetically structured sample, in which responses to group selection are also most likely to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12856238     DOI: 10.1086/375299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  11 in total

Review 1.  Fitness consequences of plants growing with siblings: reconciling kin selection, niche partitioning and competitive ability.

Authors:  Amanda L File; Guillermo P Murphy; Susan A Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evidence for competition and cooperation among climbing plants.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Effects of genomic and functional diversity on stand-level productivity and performance of non-native Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Kathryn G Turner; Claire M Lorts; Asnake T Haile; Jesse R Lasky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Growing with siblings: a common ground for cooperation or for fiercer competition among plants?

Authors:  Rubén Milla; Diana M Forero; Adrián Escudero; Jose M Iriondo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Plant kin recognition enhances abundance of symbiotic microbial partner.

Authors:  Amanda L File; John Klironomos; Hafiz Maherali; Susan A Dudley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Kin-mediated plasticity in alternative reproductive tactics.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Joseph L Tomkins; Bruno A Buzatto; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Root contact responses and the positive relationship between intraspecific diversity and ecosystem productivity.

Authors:  Lixue Yang; Ragan M Callaway; Daniel Z Atwater
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.276

Review 8.  Toward Unifying Evolutionary Ecology and Genomics to Understand Positive Plant-Plant Interactions Within Wild Species.

Authors:  Harihar Jaishree Subrahmaniam; Dominique Roby; Fabrice Roux
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Kin recognition in an annual plant.

Authors:  Susan A Dudley; Amanda L File
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Kin recognition by roots occurs in cycads and probably in conifers.

Authors:  Root Gorelick; Thomas E Marler
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2014-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.