Literature DB >> 12854452

A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials.

Franklin G Miller, Howard Brody.   

Abstract

A predominant ethical view holds that physician-investigators should conduct their research with therapeutic intent. And since a physician offering a therapy wouldn't prescribe second-rate treatments, the experimental intervention and the best proven therapy should appear equally effective. "Clinical equipoise" is necessary. But this perspective is flawed. The ethics of research and of therapy are fundamentally different, and clinical equipoise should be abandoned.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12854452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  75 in total

Review 1.  Equipoise: asking the right questions for clinical trial design.

Authors:  Steven Joffe; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  The Bucharest Early Intervention Project: case study in the ethics of mental health research.

Authors:  Charles H Zeanah; Nathan A Fox; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.254

3.  Introduction: case studies in the ethics of mental health research.

Authors:  Joseph Millum
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  Extending clinical equipoise to phase 1 trials involving patients: unresolved problems.

Authors:  James A Anderson; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2010-03

Review 5.  Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?

Authors:  P Allmark; S Mason
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Will ethical requirements bring critical care research to a halt?

Authors:  Robert D Truog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The relevance of empirical research in bioethics.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; David Wendler
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 8.  Methodological aspects of outcomes research.

Authors:  Rudi Hiebert; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill.

Authors:  Philip J Nickel
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006

10.  Oncologists' recommendations of clinical trial participation to patients.

Authors:  Susan Eggly; Terrance L Albrecht; Felicity W K Harper; Tanina Foster; Melissa M Franks; John C Ruckdeschel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.