Literature DB >> 12845425

Tibial fixation comparison of semitendinosus-bone composite allografts fixed with bioabsorbable screws and bone-patella tendon-bone grafts fixed with titanium screws.

Y Kocabey1, S Klein, J Nyland, D Caborn.   

Abstract

Tibial fixation remains the weak link of ACL reconstruction over the first 8-12 weeks postoperatively. This study compared the biomechanical properties of tibial fixation for a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft and a novel semitendinosus-bone composite (SBC) allograft with mixed cortical-cancellous bone dowels at each end. Seven paired, fresh frozen cadaveric knees (20-45 years) were stripped of all soft tissue attachments and randomly assigned to receive either the BPTB graft or SBC allograft. Grafts were placed into tibial tunnels via a standard protocol and secured with either a 10 mmx28 mm bioabsorbable (SBC) or titanium (BPTB) screw. Grafts were cycled ten times in a servo hydraulic device from 10-50 N prior to pull to failure testing at a rate of 20 mm/min with the force vector aligned with the tibial tunnel ("worst case scenario"). Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests were used to evaluate biomechanical differences between graft types ( p<0.05). Tibial bone mineral density and interference screw insertion torque were statistically equivalent between graft types. The mode of failure for all constructs was direct screw and graft construct pullout from the tibial tunnel. Significant differences were not observed between graft types for maximum load at failure strength (BPTB=620.8+/-209 N vs. SBC=601.2+/-140 N, p=0.74) or stiffness (BPTB=69.8 N/mm+/-29 N/mm vs SBC=47.1+/-31.6 N/mm, p=0.24). The SBC allograft yielded significantly more displacement prior to failure than the BPTB graft (15.1+/-4.9 mm vs 9.2+/-1.3 mm, p=0.04). Increased construct displacement appeared to be due to fixation failure, with some evidence of graft tissue tearing around the sutures: Bioabsorbable screw (10 x 28 mm) fixation of the SBC allograft produced unacceptable displacement levels during testing. Further study is recommended using a titanium interference screw or a longer bioabsorbable screw for SBC graft fixation under cyclic loading conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12845425     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-003-0370-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  29 in total

Review 1.  Loss of extension after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  T S Petsche; M R Hutchinson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Rehabilitation complications following knee surgery.

Authors:  J Nyland
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.182

3.  Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons.

Authors:  Norimasa Nakamura; Shuji Horibe; Satoru Sasaki; Takuya Kitaguchi; Mituo Tagami; Tomoki Mitsuoka; Yukiyoshi Toritsuka; Masayuki Hamada; Konsei Shino
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Isometry testing for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revisited.

Authors:  C D Morgan; V R Kalmam; D M Grawl
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking.

Authors:  J B Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction.

Authors:  M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: Perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement.

Authors:  F R Noyes; D L Butler; L E Paulos; E S Grood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Double-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-hamstring-bone composite graft.

Authors:  Ryohei Takeuchi; Tomoyuki Saito; Sigeyuki Mituhashi; Eiichi Suzuki; Ikufumi Yamada; Tomihisa Koshino
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  Gene R Barrett; Frank K Noojin; Charles W Hartzog; Carrie R Nash
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog.

Authors:  S A Rodeo; S P Arnoczky; P A Torzilli; C Hidaka; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Implant-free tibial fixations of the posterior cruciate ligament. Development and biomechanical testing].

Authors:  T Wehrhahn; M Ettinger; M Petri; E Liodakis; C Hurschler; U-V Albrecht; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The fixation strength of tibial PCL press-fit reconstructions.

Authors:  M Ettinger; T Wehrhahn; M Petri; E Liodakis; G Olender; U-V Albrecht; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Torsional stability of interference screws derived from bovine bone--a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Joscha Bauer; Turgay Efe; Silke Herdrich; Leo Gotzen; Bilal Farouk El-Zayat; Jan Schmitt; Nina Timmesfeld; Markus Dietmar Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pedro Debieux; Carlos E S Franciozi; Mário Lenza; Marcel Jun Tamaoki; Robert A Magnussen; Flávio Faloppa; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-24

5.  Biomechanical assessment of an alternative method of staple fixation for anchoring the Bone Patellar Tendon Bone graft to the tibia.

Authors:  Thomas Matthai; Vinu M George; Anbu S Rao; Anil T Oommen; Ravi J Korula; Suresh Devasahayam; Pradeep M Poonnoose
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-04-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.